Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24097821›Full record

ArticleCancer research2013

Novel modeling of cancer cell signaling pathways enables systematic drug repositioning for distinct breast cancer metastases.

Hong Zhao, Guangxu Jin, Kemi Cui, Ding Ren, Timothy Liu, Peikai Chen, Solomon Wong, Fuhai Li, Yubo Fan, Angel Rodriguez and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Computational systems biology in cancer brain metastasis.Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Application of GFP imaging in cancer.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hong ZhaoAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Systems Medicine and Bioengineering; NCI Center for Modeling Cancer Development, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College; Methodist Cancer Center, The Methodist Hospital; Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; and The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Guangxu Jin
Kemi Cui
Ding Ren
Timothy Liu
Peikai Chen
Solomon Wong
Fuhai Li
Yubo Fan
Angel Rodriguez
Jenny Chang
Stephen T C Wong
The University of Texas at Austin · USChildren's Cancer Center · USHouston Methodist · USMethodist Hospital · USCornell University · US

Funding

The Core of the Computational BiologyU54CA149196 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WONG, STEPHEN TC · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
High-content Image Analysis and Modeling for RANigenome-wide ScreeningR01CA121225 · NCI · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WONG, STEPHEN TC · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121225NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139976NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new type of signaling network element, called cancer signaling bridges (CSB), has been shown to have the potential for systematic and fast-tracked drug repositioning. On the basis of CSBs, we developed a computational model to derive specific downstream signaling pathways that reveal previously unknown target-disease connections and new mechanisms for specific cancer subtypes. The model enables us to reposition drugs based on available patient gene expression data. We applied this model to repurpose known or shelved drugs for brain, lung, and bone metastases of breast cancer with the hypothesis that cancer subtypes have their own specific signaling mechanisms. To test the hypothesis, we addressed specific CSBs for each metastasis that satisfy (i) CSB proteins are activated by the maximal number of enriched signaling pathways specific to a given metastasis, and (ii) CSB proteins are involved in the most differential expressed coding genes specific to each breast cancer metastasis. The identified signaling networks for the three types of breast cancer metastases contain 31, 15, and 18 proteins and are used to reposition 15, 9, and 2 drug candidates for the brain, lung, and bone metastases. We conducted both in vitro and in vivo preclinical experiments as well as analysis on patient tumor specimens to evaluate the targets and repositioned drugs. Of special note, we found that the Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, sunitinib and dasatinib, prohibit brain metastases derived from breast cancer, addressing one particularly challenging aspect of this disease.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningModels, BiologicalBone NeoplasmsBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMicroarray AnalysisNeoplasm MetastasisSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID24097821
PMCPMC4005386
OpenAlexW2146172028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.