ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014
Simulations of enhancer evolution provide mechanistic insights into gene regulation.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Deriving a genetic regulatory network from an optimization principle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- On the incongruence of genotype-phenotype and fitness landscapes.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Deciphering enhancer sequence using thermodynamics-based models and convolutional neural networks.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Ancestral sequence reconstruction - An underused approach to understand the evolution of gene function in plants?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Phylogenetic Modeling of Regulatory Element Turnover Based on Epigenomic Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of microRNA target sites across vertebrate evolution.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- The Role of Chromatin Accessibility in cis-Regulatory Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- TFforge utilizes large-scale binding site divergence to identify transcriptional regulators involved in phenotypic differences.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- REforge Associates Transcription Factor Binding Site Divergence in Regulatory Elements with Phenotypic Differences between Species.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Contribution of transposable elements and distal enhancers to evolution of human-specific features of interphase chromatin architecture in embryonic stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018Article
- In silico evolution of the Drosophila gap gene regulatory sequence under elevated mutational pressure.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- Translating natural genetic variation to gene expression in a computational model of the Drosophila gap gene regulatory network.PloS one · 2017Article
- Quantitative modeling of gene expression using DNA shape features of binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Dynamics of Transcription Factor Binding Site Evolution.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- What does it take to evolve an enhancer? A simulation-based study of factors influencing the emergence of combinatorial regulation.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Analysis of functional importance of binding sites in the Drosophila gap gene network model.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Modeling Clinical States and Metabolic Rhythms in Bioarcheology.BioMed research international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing interest in models of regulatory sequence evolution. However, existing models specifically designed for regulatory sequences consider the independent evolution of individual transcription factor (TF)-binding sites, ignoring that the function and evolution of a binding site depends on its context, typically the cis-regulatory module (CRM) in which the site is located. Moreover, existing models do not account for the gene-specific roles of TF-binding sites, primarily because their roles often are not well understood. We introduce two models of regulatory sequence evolution that address some of the shortcomings of existing models and implement simulation frameworks based on them. One model simulates the evolution of an individual binding site in the context of a CRM, while the other evolves an entire CRM. Both models use a state-of-the art sequence-to-expression model to predict the effects of mutations on the regulatory output of the CRM and determine the strength of selection. We use the new framework to simulate the evolution of TF-binding sites in 37 well-studied CRMs belonging to the anterior-posterior patterning system in Drosophila embryos. We show that these simulations provide accurate fits to evolutionary data from 12 Drosophila genomes, which includes statistics of binding site conservation on relatively short evolutionary scales and site loss across larger divergence times. The new framework allows us, for the first time, to test hypotheses regarding the underlying cis-regulatory code by directly comparing the evolutionary implications of the hypothesis with the observed evolutionary dynamics of binding sites. Using this capability, we find that explicitly modeling self-cooperative DNA binding by the TF Caudal (CAD) provides significantly better fits than an otherwise identical evolutionary simulation that lacks this mechanistic aspect. This hypothesis is further supported by a statistical analysis of the distribution of intersite spacing between adjacent CAD sites. Experimental tests confirm direct homodimeric interaction between CAD molecules as well as self-cooperative DNA binding by CAD. We note that computational modeling of the D. melanogaster CRMs alone did not yield significant evidence to support CAD self-cooperativity. We thus demonstrate how specific mechanistic details encoded in CRMs can be revealed by modeling their evolution and fitting such models to multispecies data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.