ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2014
Evaluating patient acceptability of a culturally focused psychiatric consultation intervention for Latino Americans with depression.
Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2015Pooled it
- Home language and diagnostic co-morbidity predict neuropsychological evaluation recommendation uptake among low income families.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2026Article
- Physical activity programs for cardiovascular outcomes in community wheelchair users: A systematic review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Review
- Increasing Diversity in Radiology and Molecular Imaging: Current Challenges.Molecular imaging and biology · 2021Review
- Challenges and Initiatives in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Cancer Molecular Imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Patient primary language in a culturally focused intervention for Latino Americans with depression.Annals of clinical psychiatry : official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists · 2018Article
- What is appropriate care? An integrative review of emerging themes in the literature.BMC health services research · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant disparities exist in both access to and quality of mental health care for Latino Americans with depression compared to Caucasians, resulting in a greater burden of disability in this underserved population. Our aim is to evaluate participant acceptability of a Culturally Focused Psychiatric (CFP) consultation program for depressed Latino Americans. Latino American adult primary care patients endorsing depressive symptoms on a screening questionnaire were targeted in their primary care clinic. The intervention addressed participants' depressive symptoms using culturally adapted clinical assessments and toolkits. Acceptability was evaluated using a treatment satisfaction scale and in-depth semi-structured interviews. Overall, 85% of participants responded positively to all questions of the satisfaction scale. In in-depth interviews, the vast majority of participants reported the program met expectations, all stated providers were culturally sensitive, and most stated recommendations were culturally sensitive. The CFP program was found to be acceptable to a group of depressed Latino American primary care patients. Further research is needed to evaluate if the CFP intervention can improve depressive symptoms and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.