ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2014
Optical systems for point-of-care diagnostic instrumentation: analysis of imaging performance and cost.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technologies for the point-of-care diagnosis of malaria: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- A review of Optical Point-of-Care devices to Estimate the Technology Transfer of These Cutting-Edge Technologies.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Design and Fabrication of Optical Flow Cell for Multiplex Detection of β-lactamase in Microchannels.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Frugal filtering optical lenses for point-of-care diagnostics.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Microfluidic Point-of-Care Devices: New Trends and Future Prospects for eHealth Diagnostics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Inorganic Complexes and Metal-Based Nanomaterials for Infectious Disease Diagnostics.Chemical reviews · 2019Review
- Histogram analysis for smartphone-based rapid hematocrit determination.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- All-plastic, miniature, digital fluorescence microscope for three part white blood cell differential measurements at the point of care.Biomedical optics express · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the key elements in point-of-care (POC) diagnostic test instrumentation is the optical system required for signal detection and/or imaging. Many tests which use fluorescence, absorbance, or colorimetric optical signals are under development for management of infectious diseases in resource limited settings, where the overall size and cost of the device is of critical importance. At present, high-performance lenses are expensive to fabricate and difficult to obtain commercially, presenting barriers for developers of in vitro POC tests or microscopic image-based diagnostics. We recently described a compact "hybrid" objective lens incorporating both glass and plastic optical elements, with a numerical aperture of 1.0 and field-of-view of 250 μm. This design concept may potentially enable mass-production of high-performance, low-cost optical systems which can be easily incorporated in the readout path of existing and emerging POC diagnostic assays. In this paper, we evaluate the biological imaging performance of these lens systems in three broad POC diagnostic application areas; (1) bright field microscopy of histopathology slides, (2) cytologic examination of blood smears, and (3) immunofluorescence imaging. We also break down the fabrication costs and draw comparisons with other miniature optical systems. The hybrid lenses provided images with quality comparable to conventional microscopy, enabling examination of neoplastic pathology and infectious parasites including malaria and cryptosporidium. We describe how these components can be produced at below $10 per unit in full-scale production quantities, making these systems well suited for use within POC diagnostic instrumentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.