Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24097128›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2013

Efficacy of anti-inflammatory or antibiotic treatment in patients with non-complicated acute bronchitis and discoloured sputum: randomised placebo controlled trial.

Carl Llor, Ana Moragas, Carolina Bayona, Rosa Morros, Helena Pera, Oleguer Plana-Ripoll, Josep M Cots, Marc Miravitlles

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. HATRIC: a study ofPilot and feasibility studies · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Long-lasting cough in an adult German population: incidence, symptoms, and related pathogens.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Novel approaches are needed to develop tomorrow's antibacterial therapies.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Carl LlorDepartment of General Pathology. University Rovira i Virgili, Primary Care Centre Jaume I, c Felip Pedrell, 45-47 43005 Tarragona, Spain.
Ana Moragas
Carolina Bayona
Rosa Morros
Helena Pera
Oleguer Plana-Ripoll
Josep M Cots
Marc Miravitlles
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESAarhus University · DKCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESUniversidad Rovira i Virgili · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of oral anti-inflammatory or antibiotic treatment compared with placebo in the resolution of cough in patients with uncomplicated acute bronchitis and discoloured sputum.

designMulticentre, parallel, single blinded placebo controlled, randomised clinical trial.

settingNine primary care centres in Spain.

participantsAdults aged 18 to 70 presenting symptoms associated with respiratory tract infection of less than one week's duration, with cough as the predominant symptom, the presence of discoloured sputum, and at least one other symptom of lower respiratory tract infection (dyspnoea, wheezing, chest discomfort, or chest pain).

interventionsPatients were randomised to receive either ibuprofen 600 mg three times daily, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 500 mg/125 mg three times daily, or placebo three times daily for 10 days. The duration of symptoms was measured with a diary card.

main outcome measureNumber of days with frequent cough after the randomisation visit.

results416 participants were randomised (136 to ibuprofen, 137 to antibiotic, and 143 to placebo) and 390 returned their symptom diaries fully completed. The median number of days with frequent cough was slightly lower among patients assigned to ibuprofen (9 days, 95% confidence interval 8 to 10 days) compared with those receiving amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (11 days, 10 to 12 days) or placebo (11 days, 8 to 14 days), albeit without statistically significant differences. Neither amoxicillin-clavulanic acid nor ibuprofen increased the probability of cough resolution (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.35 and 1.23, 0.93 to 1.61, respectively) compared with placebo. Adverse events were observed in 27 patients, and were more common in the antibiotic arm (12%) than ibuprofen or placebo arms (5% and 3%, respectively; P<0.01).

conclusionNo significant differences were observed in the number of days with cough between patients with uncomplicated acute bronchitis and discoloured sputum treated with ibuprofen, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, or placebo.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN07852892.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchitisCoughDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIbuprofenMaleMiddle AgedAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsIbuprofen

Identifiers

PMID24097128
PMCPMC3790568
OpenAlexW2130996017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.