Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24096737›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2014

Primary 4T1 tumor resection provides critical "window of opportunity" for immunotherapy.

Anahit Ghochikyan, Arpine Davtyan, Armine Hovakimyan, Hayk Davtyan, Anna Poghosyan, Alexander Bagaev, Ravshan I Ataullakhanov, Edward L Nelson, Michael G Agadjanyan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tumor Resection Recruits Effector T Cells and Boosts Therapeutic Efficacy of Encapsulated Stem Cells Expressing IFNβ in Glioblastomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anahit GhochikyanDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Institute for Molecular Medicine, 16371 Gothard Street, Suite H, Huntington Beach, CA, 92647, USA, aghochikyan@immed.org.
Arpine Davtyan
Armine Hovakimyan
Hayk Davtyan
Anna Poghosyan
Alexander Bagaev
Ravshan I Ataullakhanov
Edward L Nelson
Michael G Agadjanyan
Institute for Molecular Medicine · USInstitute of Immunology and Physiology · RUUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Joel E Milam · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Training in the Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseT32AG000096 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI VIVEK SWARUP, Craig E Stark · 1985 to 2026
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS P30CA062203NIA NIH HHS AG000096NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is believed that primary tumor resection modulates host-tumor immune interaction, but this has not been characterized in a stringent breast cancer tumor model. This report, using the 4T1 murine mammary tumor model, characterizes for the first time the dynamic longitudinal changes in immunosuppressive and effector components of the immune system after resection of an established orthotopic primary tumor with a defined natural history of developing lung metastases. More specifically, we analyzed changes of absolute numbers and frequencies of MDSC, regulatory T cells (Treg), as well as activated CD4 and CD8 positive T cells in spleens and, in some studies, lungs of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice and mice after primary tumor resection. Importantly, using mathematical analyses we established that primary resection of an orthotopic tumor had created a "window of opportunity" with decreased tumor-associated immune suppression that existed for approximately 10 days. Although tumor resection did slightly prolong survival, it did not affect the ultimate development of metastatic disease since animals with resected tumors or intact primary tumors eventually died by day 47 and 43, respectively. This window of opportunity likely occurs in humans providing a rationale and parameters for integration and testing of immunotherapeutic strategies in this critical "window of opportunity" to combat the development of metastatic disease.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMice

Identifiers

PMID24096737
PMCPMC3946940
OpenAlexW2037381647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.