Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24096545›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

QM-FISH analysis of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway in triple-negative breast cancer.

Sheng Zhang, Yingbo Shao, Guofang Hou, Jingchao Bai, Weiping Yuan, Linping Hu, Tao Cheng, Anders Zetterberg, Jin Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheng Zhang3rd Department of Breast Cancer, China Tianjin Breast Cancer Prevention, Treatment and Research center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Yingbo Shao
Guofang Hou
Jingchao Bai
Weiping Yuan
Linping Hu
Tao Cheng
Anders Zetterberg
Jin Zhang
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNInstitute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital · CNKarolinska University Hospital · SEState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze copy number alterations (CNAs) of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to evaluate their clinical value in the prognosis of TNBC. Quantitative multi-gene fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to study CNAs of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway, including cyclin d1 (CCND1), c-Myc, p21, cell-cycle-checkpoint kinase 2 gene, p16, retinoblastoma (Rb1), murine double minute 2 (Mdm2) and p53, in 60 TNBC samples and 60 non-TNBC samples. In comparison with the non-TNBC samples, CNAs of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway were more frequently observed in the TNBC samples (p = 0.000). Out of a total of eight genes, six (CCND1, c-Myc, p16, Rb1, Mdm2, and p53) exhibited significantly different CNAs between the TNBC group and the non-TNBC group. Univariate survival analysis revealed that the gene amplification of c-Myc (p = 0.008), Mdm2 (p = 0.020) and the gene deletion of p21 (p = 0.004), p16 (p = 0.015), and Rb1 (p = 0.028) were the independent predictive factor of 5-year OS for patients with TNBC. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that the gene amplification of c-Myc (p = 0.026) and the gene deletion of p21 (p = 0.019) and p16 (p = 0.034) were independent prognostic factors affecting the 5-year OS for TNBC. CNAs of the genes involved in the G1/S checkpoint signaling pathway presented a higher rate of incidence in TNBC than in non-TNBC, which could indicate one of the molecular mechanisms for the specific biological characteristics of TNBC. The genes c-Myc, p21, and p16 were correlated with the prognosis of TNBC and therefore may have potential clinical application values in the prognostic prediction of TNBC.

Indexed as

Genes, p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21FemaleG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGene DosageHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateProportional Hazards ModelsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSignal TransductionTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21MYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID24096545
OpenAlexW1999285626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.