Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24096242›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2013

The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch.

Philippe Collin, Oxana Nashchekina, Rachael Walker, Jonathon Pines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Measuring and modeling the dynamics of mitotic error correction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philippe CollinThe Gurdon Institute, and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Oxana Nashchekina
Rachael Walker
Jonathon Pines

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G001537/1Cancer Research UK 13678Cancer Research UK A3211Cancer Research UK A7397Cancer Research UK C6946/A14492Wellcome Trust 079249Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is essential in mammalian mitosis to ensure the equal segregation of sister chromatids. The SAC generates a mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) to prevent the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) from targeting key mitotic regulators for destruction until all of the chromosomes have attached to the mitotic apparatus. A single unattached kinetochore can delay anaphase for several hours, but how it is able to block the APC/C throughout the cell is not understood. Present concepts of the SAC posit that either it exhibits an all-or-nothing response or there is a minimum threshold sufficient to block the APC/C (ref. 7). Here, we have used gene targeting to measure SAC activity, and find that it does not have an all-or-nothing response. Instead, the strength of the SAC depends on the amount of MAD2 recruited to kinetochores and on the amount of MCC formed. Furthermore, we show that different drugs activate the SAC to different extents, which may be relevant to their efficacy in chemotherapy.

Indexed as

M Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsSpindle ApparatusAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeCell LineHumansAnaphase-Promoting Complex-Cyclosome

Identifiers

PMID24096242
PMCPMC3836401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.