ArticlePatient education and counseling2014
Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussion content and patients' use of colorectal cancer screening.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06182475 (Increasing Equity in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation Through Effective Patient-Provider Communication), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Increasing Equity in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation Through Effective Patient-Provider Communication
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.Preventive medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Trial
- Does patient time spent viewing computer-tailored colorectal cancer screening materials predict patient-reported discussion of screening with providers?Health education research · 2016Trial
- Colorectal Cancer Messaging and Gaps in Knowledge Among Screening-Eligible Individuals.Health promotion practice · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Variability in Causal Effects and Noncompliance in a Multisite Trial: A Bivariate Hierarchical Generalized Random Coefficients Model for a Binary Outcome.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Colorectal cancer screening utilization among breast, cervical, prostate, skin, and lung cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening promotion among Black individuals: social ecological perspectives from key informants interviews.Ethnicity & health · 2023Article
- Adoption and Value of the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit: A Mixed-Methods Study.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2023Article
- "Mm-hm," "Uh-uh": are non-lexical conversational sounds deal breakers for the ambient clinical documentation technology?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Automatic speech recognition performance for digital scribes: a performance comparison between general-purpose and specialized models tuned for patient-clinician conversations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
- Lower Adherence: A Description of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barrier Talk.Journal of health communication · 2020Observational
- Understanding primary care providers' perceptions of cancer prevention and screening in a predominantly rural healthcare system in the upper Midwest.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- The effect of the Affordable Care Act on patient out-of-pocket cost and use of preventive cancer screenings in Massachusetts.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
- Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- A national survey of primary care physicians: Perceptions and practices of low-dose CT lung cancer screening.Preventive medicine reports · 2018Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Colorectal Cancer Decision Aid Using a Centralized Delivery Strategy.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2018Article
- Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening and recommendation behaviors among physicians in Korea.BMC cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe US Preventive Services Task Force recommends using the 5As (i.e., Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist and Arrange) when discussing preventive services. We evaluate the association of the 5As discussion during primary care office visits with patients' subsequent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening use.
methodsAudio-recordings of n=443 periodic health exams among insured patients aged 50-80 years and due for CRC screening were joined with pre-visit patient surveys and screening use data from an electronic medical record. Association of the 5As with CRC screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations.
results93% of patients received a recommendation for screening (Advise) and 53% were screened in the following year. The likelihood of screening increased as the number of 5A steps increased: compared to patients whose visit contained no 5A step, those whose visit contained 1-2 steps (OR=2.96 [95% CI 1.16, 7.53]) and 3 or more steps (4.98 [95% CI 1.84, 13.44]) were significantly more likely to use screening.
conclusionsPhysician CRC screening recommendations that include recommended 5A steps are associated with increased patient adherence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A CRC screening recommendation (Advise) that also describes patient eligibility (Assess) and provides help to obtain screening (Assist) may lead to improved adherence to CRC screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.