ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2013
Use and perceived benefits of mobile devices by physicians in preventing adverse drug events in the nursing home.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Pooled it
- Effects of a video intervention on physicians' acceptance of pain apps: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2022Trial
- Organization-level factors associated with the adoption of care robots in long-term care providers: insights from a 3-year pooled cross-sectional study in Japan.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Research on the Impact of an AI Voice Assistant's Gender and Self-Disclosure Strategies on User Self-Disclosure in Chinese Postpartum Follow-Up Phone Calls.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long-Term Adoption or Abandonment of Smart Technology in the Chinese Elderly Home Care Environment: A Qualitative Research Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Defining the concepts of a smart nursing home and its potential technology utilities that integrate medical services and are acceptable to stakeholders: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- The expectations and acceptability of a smart nursing home model among Chinese elderly people: A mixed methods study protocol.PloS one · 2021Article
- Impact of training and structured medication review on medication appropriateness and patient-related outcomes in nursing homes: results from the interventional study InTherAKT.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- Mobile technologies: expectancy, usage, and acceptance of clinical staff and patients at a university medical center.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2014Article
- An ontology-based, mobile-optimized system for pharmacogenomic decision support at the point-of-care.PloS one · 2014Article
- A survey of nursing home physicians to determine laboratory monitoring adverse drug event alert preferences.Applied clinical informatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAlthough mobile devices equipped with drug reference software may help prevent adverse drug events (ADEs) in the nursing home (NH) by providing medication information at the point of care, little is known about their use and perceived benefits. The goal of this study was to conduct a survey of a nationally representative sample of NH physicians to quantify the use and perceived benefits of mobile devices in preventing ADEs in the NH setting. DESIGN/SETTING/
participantsWe surveyed physicians who attended the 2010 American Medical Directors Association Annual Symposium about their use of mobile devices, and beliefs about the effectiveness of drug reference software in preventing ADEs.
resultsThe overall net valid response rate was 70% (558/800) with 42% (236/558) using mobile devices to assist with prescribing in the NH. Physicians with 15 or fewer years of clinical experience were 67% more likely to be mobile device users, compared with those with more than 15 years of clinical experience (odds ratio = 1.68; 95% confidence interval = 1.17-2.41; P = .005). For those who used a mobile device to assist with prescribing, almost all (98%) reported performing an average of 1 or more drug look-ups per day, performed an average of 1 to 2 lookups per day for potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and most (88%) believed that drug reference software had helped to prevent at least 1 potential ADE in the preceding 4-week period.
conclusionsThe proportion of NH physicians who use mobile devices with drug reference software, although significant, is lower than in other clinical environments. Our results suggest that NH physicians who use mobile devices equipped with drug reference software believe they are helpful for reducing ADEs. Further research is needed to better characterize the facilitators and barriers to adoption of the technology in the NH and its precise impact on NH ADEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.