Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24094861›Full record

ReviewTrends in biotechnology2013

A tale of two specificities: bispecific antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic applications.

Hannah Byrne, Paul J Conroy, James C Whisstock, Richard J O'Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Applications of synthetic biology in medical and pharmaceutical fields.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah ByrneSchool of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Paul J Conroy
James C Whisstock
Richard J O'Kennedy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial manipulation of antibody genes has facilitated the production of several unique recombinant antibody formats, which have highly important therapeutic and biotechnological applications. Although bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are not new, they are coming to the forefront as our knowledge of the potential efficacy of antibody-based therapeutics expands. The next generation of bsAbs is developing due to significant improvements in recombinant antibody technologies. This review focuses on recent advances with a particular focus on improvements in format and design that are contributing to the resurgence of bsAbs, and in particular, on innovative structures applicable to next generation point-of-care (POC) devices with applicability to low resource environments.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAntibodies, MonoclonalBiotechnologyPoint-of-Care SystemsProtein EngineeringRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Chain AntibodiesTechnology, PharmaceuticalAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, MonoclonalRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Chain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID24094861
PMCPMC7114091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.