Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24094857›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2013

Nuclear repulsion enables division autonomy in a single cytoplasm.

Cori A Anderson, Umut Eser, Therese Korndorf, Mark E Borsuk, Jan M Skotheim, Amy S Gladfelter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A phase oscillator model of cell cycles reveals nuclear density control in a branched fungal network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. mBio · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Syncytia in Fungi.Cells · 2020
    Review
  20. Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cori A AndersonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Umut Eser
Therese Korndorf
Mark E Borsuk
Jan M Skotheim
Amy S Gladfelter
Dartmouth College · USStanford University · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Molecular and Cellular Biology at DartmouthT32GM008704 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI COMPTON, DUANE A. · 1998 to 2018
$6.8M
Cytoplasmic Organization by phase transitionsR01GM081506 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GLADFELTER, AMY S · 2010 to 2023
$4.0M
Mechanisms of restriction point response to dynamic growth factor signalsR01GM092925 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SKOTHEIM, JAN M · 2010 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081506NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM081506NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092925NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM092925NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008704NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent models of cell-cycle control, based on classic studies of fused cells, predict that nuclei in a shared cytoplasm respond to the same CDK activities to undergo synchronous cycling. However, synchrony is rarely observed in naturally occurring syncytia, such as the multinucleate fungus Ashbya gossypii. In this system, nuclei divide asynchronously, raising the question of how nuclear timing differences are maintained despite sharing a common milieu.

resultsWe observe that neighboring nuclei are highly variable in division-cycle duration and that neighbors repel one another to space apart and demarcate their own cytoplasmic territories. The size of these territories increases as a nucleus approaches mitosis and can influence cycling rates. This nonrandom nuclear spacing is regulated by microtubules and is required for nuclear asynchrony, as nuclei that transiently come in very close proximity will partially synchronize. Sister nuclei born of the same mitosis are generally not persistent neighbors over their lifetimes yet remarkably retain similar division cycle times. This indicates that nuclei carry a memory of their birth state that influences their division timing and supports that nuclei subdivide a common cytosol into functionally distinct yet mobile compartments.

conclusionsThese findings support that nuclei use cytoplasmic microtubules to establish "cells within cells." Individual compartments appear to push against one another to compete for cytoplasmic territory and insulate the division cycle. This provides a mechanism by which syncytial nuclei can spatially organize cell-cycle signaling and suggests size control can act in a system without physical boundaries.

Indexed as

Cell Nucleus DivisionCytoplasmEremotheciumGiant CellsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMicroscopyTime-Lapse ImagingGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24094857
PMCPMC4085259
OpenAlexW2147171564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.