Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24094755›Full record

ArticleContraception2013

Psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level chosen at an urban clinic.

Julia R Steinberg, Jeanne M Tschann, Jillian T Henderson, Eleanor A Drey, Jody E Steinauer, Cynthia C Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Contraceptive Use over Five Years After Receipt Or Denial of Abortion Services.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2018
    Article
  11. Social Disparities in the Relationship Between Depression and Unintended Pregnancy During Adolescence and Young Adulthood.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Social discrimination, stress, and risk of unintended pregnancy among young women.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2015
    Article
  17. Psychological Aspects of Contraception, Unintended Pregnancy, and Abortion.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia R SteinbergDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, 3333 California St., Ste. 465, Box 0848, San Francisco, CA 94143-0848, USA. Electronic address: Julia.Steinberg@ucsf.edu.
Jeanne M Tschann
Jillian T Henderson
Eleanor A Drey
Jody E Steinauer
Cynthia C Harper
University of California, San Francisco · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · US

Funding

UCSF/Kaiser-DOR Program for Developing Independent Women's Health ResearchersK12HD052163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, BRINDIS, CLAIRE D. · 2005 to 2023
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated whether more psychological distress before an abortion is associated with the effectiveness of contraception selected (low, moderate, or high effectiveness) at an abortion clinic visit.

methodUsing data from 253 women attending an urban abortion clinic that primarily serves low-income women, we tested the association between pre-abortion psychological distress and the effectiveness level of post-abortion contraceptive choice. Based on typical use failure rates, we classified effectiveness of contraceptive choice into three levels-low, moderate, and high effectiveness. We measured psychological distress with four validated measures of depressive, anxious, and stress symptoms, and negative affect, as well as with a global measure comprising these four measures. We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression to measure the association of each psychological distress measure with post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, pregnancy history, trimester of abortion, and importance of avoiding pregnancy in the next year.

resultsWe found that compared to women experiencing less stress symptoms, negative affect and global psychological distress, women experiencing more stress symptoms [AOR=1.028, 95% CI: 1.001-1.050], negative affect [AOR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09] and global psychological distress [AOR=1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.95] were more likely to choose more effective versus less effective methods, p<.05, in adjusted models. Using dichotomous psychological measures we found similar results.

conclusionsWomen experiencing more psychological distress before an abortion selected more effective contraceptive methods after their abortion. Future research should examine whether this distress is associated with subsequent contraceptive use or continuation. IMPLICATIONS: The current study suggests that contraceptive providers should not assume that women experiencing more psychological distress prefer to use less effective contraceptive methods.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorUrban PopulationAbortion, InducedAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChoice BehaviorContraceptionFemaleHumansPovertyPregnancyStress, PsychologicalWomenContraceptive effectiveness levelPost-abortion contraceptive method selectionPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID24094755
PMCPMC3844792
OpenAlexW2077941336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.