Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24094202›Full record

ArticleMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2013

Subcritical CO2 sintering of microspheres of different polymeric materials to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Manjari Bhamidipati, BanuPriya Sridharan, Aaron M Scurto, Michael S Detamore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. COActa biomaterialia · 2018
    Article
  8. Microsphere-Based Scaffolds in Regenerative Engineering.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manjari BhamidipatiBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
BanuPriya Sridharan
Aaron M Scurto
Michael S Detamore

Funding

Solvent-free engineering of a shape-specific osteochondral TMJ condyleR21EB007313 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DETAMORE, MICHAEL S. · 2009 to 2010
$401k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB007313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to use CO2 at sub-critical pressures as a tool to sinter 3D, macroporous, microsphere-based scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Porous scaffolds composed of ~200 μm microspheres of either poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) or polycaprolactone (PCL) were prepared using dense phase CO2 sintering, which were seeded with rat bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (rBMSCs), and exposed to either osteogenic (PLGA, PCL) or chondrogenic (PLGA) conditions for 6 weeks. Under osteogenic conditions, the PLGA constructs produced over an order of magnitude more calcium than the PCL constructs, whereas the PCL constructs had far superior mechanical and structural integrity (125 times stiffer than PLGA constructs) at week 6, along with twice the cell content of the PLGA constructs. Chondrogenic cell performance was limited in PLGA constructs, perhaps as a result of the polymer degradation rate being too high. The current study represents the first long-term culture of CO2-sintered microsphere-based scaffolds, and has established important thermodynamic differences in sintering between the selected formulations of PLGA and PCL, with the former requiring adjustment of pressure only, and the latter requiring the adjustment of both pressure and temperature. Based on more straightforward sintering conditions and more favorable cell performance, PLGA may be the material of choice for microspheres in a CO2 sintering application, although a different PLGA formulation with the encapsulation of growth factors, extracellular matrix-derived nanoparticles, and/or buffers in the microspheres may be advantageous for achieving a more superior cell performance than observed here.

Indexed as

MicrospheresTissue EngineeringAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Marrow CellsCalciumCarbon DioxideCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrogenesisElastic ModulusExtracellular MatrixGlycosaminoglycansHydroxyprolineIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLactic AcidBiocompatible MaterialsCalciumCarbon DioxideGlycosaminoglycansHydroxyprolineIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLactic AcidPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerMicrospheresPCLPLGASinteringSubcritical CO(2)

Identifiers

PMID24094202
PMCPMC3837075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.