Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24094072›Full record

ArticleHematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2014

Radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures following allogeneic stem cell transplantation--how much is acceptable?

Minoo Battiwalla, Farhad Fakhrejahani, Natasha A Jain, Jeffrey K Klotz, Priyanka A Pophali, Debbie Draper, Janice Haggerty, Zachariah McIver, James Jelinek, Kamna Chawla and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minoo Battiwalla
Farhad Fakhrejahani
Natasha A Jain
Jeffrey K Klotz
Priyanka A Pophali
Debbie Draper
Janice Haggerty
Zachariah McIver
James Jelinek
Kamna Chawla
Sawa Ito
John Barrett
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · US

Funding

improving outcomes after stem cell transplantationZIAHL006105 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI BARRETT, AUSTIN JOHN · 2011 to 2017
$11.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HL999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL006105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrequent diagnostic radiology procedures in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients raise concern about the potential harm from incidental radiation.

objectivesTo determine the cumulative radiation dose from diagnostic studies in allogeneic SCT and its impact on clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the cumulative radiation dose from diagnostic studies following SCT. Sixty-four consecutive patients with hematological malignancies in a single tertiary care institution underwent total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative conditioning followed by six of six human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling allogeneic SCT. The median follow-up was 3 years. The cumulative effective dose in mSv from diagnostic radiological studies in the peri-transplant period from day -30 to day +200 was calculated for each patient and its impact on overall survival and non-relapse mortality was determined.

resultsThe median cumulative radiation exposure from diagnostic radiological procedures was 92 mSv (range 1.2-300), representing about 30× the normal annual background radiation for the population and 10% of the 1200 cGy TBI dose used in conditioning. Sixty-five percent of the cumulative radiation exposure was delivered between day +1 and day 100 and computed tomography scans contributed 88%. In multivariate analysis, diagnostic procedures did not significantly impact clinical outcomes.

conclusionsWhile radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures did not impact clinical outcomes the risk of secondary cancers in long-term survivors is likely to be increased. Our results indicate that patients who are acutely ill for prolonged periods can receive clinically significant radiation doses during their hospital care. Our findings should prompt attempts to limit radiation exposure from diagnostic procedures in post-SCT recipients.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationRadiation DosageRadiation EffectsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTDiagnosticHSCTOutcomeRadiation

Identifiers

PMID24094072
PMCPMC4155497
OpenAlexW2107829424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.