ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2013
Recovering a representative conformational ensemble from underdetermined macromolecular structural data.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- AmideBiomolecular NMR assignments · 2026Article
- The Ubiquitin Script: writing protein fates in chains.Essays in biochemistry · 2025Review
- Combining simulations and experiments - a perspective on maximum entropy methods.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2025Review
- Frontiers in integrative structural modeling of macromolecular assemblies.QRB discovery · 2025Review
- Ubiquitin's Conformational Heterogeneity as Discerned by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2024Review
- Computational Methods to Investigate Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and their Complexes.ArXiv · 2024Article
- An integrated approach of NMR experiments and MD simulations visualizes structural dynamics of a cyclic multi-domain protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Article
- Dual domain recognition determines SARS-CoV-2 PLpro selectivity for human ISG15 and K48-linked di-ubiquitin.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Dual domain recognition determines SARS-CoV-2 PLpro selectivity for human ISG15 and K48-linked di-ubiquitin.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Reweighting methods for elucidation of conformation ensembles of proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Interdomain Dynamics via Paramagnetic NMR on the Highly Flexible Complex Calmodulin/Munc13-1.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022Article
- Characterisation of HOIP RBR E3 ligase conformational dynamics using integrative modelling.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Extracting time series matching a small-angle X-ray scattering profile from trajectories of molecular dynamics simulations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Characterizing conformational ensembles of multi-domain proteins using anisotropic paramagnetic NMR restraints.Biophysical reviews · 2022Review
- Huntingtin structure is orchestrated by HAP40 and shows a polyglutamine expansion-specific interaction with exon 1.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Recent Developments in Data-Assisted Modeling of Flexible Proteins.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Comprehensive Structural and Thermodynamic Analysis of Prefibrillar WT α-Synuclein and Its G51D, E46K, and A53T Mutants by a Combination of Small-Angle X-ray Scattering and Variational Bayesian Weighting.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- The dynamics of linear polyubiquitin.Science advances · 2020Article
- Alternative splicing and allosteric regulation modulate the chromatin binding of UHRF1.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Targeting Intrinsically Disordered Proteins through Dynamic Interactions.Biomolecules · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural analysis of proteins and nucleic acids is complicated by their inherent flexibility, conferred, for example, by linkers between their contiguous domains. Therefore, the macromolecule needs to be represented by an ensemble of conformations instead of a single conformation. Determining this ensemble is challenging because the experimental data are a convoluted average of contributions from multiple conformations. As the number of the ensemble degrees of freedom generally greatly exceeds the number of independent observables, directly deconvolving experimental data into a representative ensemble is an ill-posed problem. Recent developments in sparse approximations and compressive sensing have demonstrated that useful information can be recovered from underdetermined (ill-posed) systems of linear equations by using sparsity regularization. Inspired by these advances, we designed the Sparse Ensemble Selection (SES) method for recovering multiple conformations from a limited number of observations. SES is more general and accurate than previously published minimum-ensemble methods, and we use it to obtain representative conformational ensembles of Lys48-linked diubiquitin, characterized by the residual dipolar coupling data measured at several pH conditions. These representative ensembles are validated against NMR chemical shift perturbation data and compared to maximum-entropy results. The SES method reproduced and quantified the previously observed pH dependence of the major conformation of Lys48-linked diubiquitin, and revealed lesser-populated conformations that are preorganized for binding known diubiquitin receptors, thus providing insights into possible mechanisms of receptor recognition by polyubiquitin. SES is applicable to any experimental observables that can be expressed as a weighted linear combination of data for individual states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.