Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24093757›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical bioinformatics2013

Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks.

Md Fahmid Islam, Md Moinul Hoque, Rajat Suvra Banik, Sanjoy Roy, Sharmin Sultana Sumi, F M Nazmul Hassan, Md Tauhid Siddiki Tomal, Ahmad Ullah, K M Taufiqur Rahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Md Fahmid Islam *Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
Md Moinul Hoque *Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
Rajat Suvra Banik *Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
Sanjoy Roy *Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
Sharmin Sultana Sumi *Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
F M Nazmul HassanBiotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
Md Tauhid Siddiki TomalBiotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
Ahmad Ullah *Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.
K M Taufiqur RahmanBiotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard.

methodsIn the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively.

resultsIn case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions.

conclusionThe study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.

Identifiers

PMID24093757
PMCPMC3852839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.