Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24093225›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2013

Clinical review: the critical care management of the burn patient.

Jane A Snell, Ne-Hooi W Loh, Tushar Mahambrey, Kayvan Shokrollahi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03930108 (Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03930108 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score as Predictor of Mortality in Critically-ill Burn Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled169ConditionsMortality PredictionArmsSOFA score
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Fast and interpretable mortality risk scores for critical care patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  8. Long-term Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Older Adults Following a Major Burn Injury: A Burn Model System Investigation.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pharmacological YAP activation promotes regenerative repair of cutaneous wounds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. miR-181c, a potential mediator for acute kidney injury in a burn rat model with following sepsis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane A Snell
Ne-Hooi W Loh
Tushar Mahambrey
Kayvan Shokrollahi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 4 and 22% of burn patients presenting to the emergency department are admitted to critical care. Burn injury is characterised by a hypermetabolic response with physiologic, catabolic and immune effects. Burn care has seen renewed interest in colloid resuscitation, a change in transfusion practice and the development of anti-catabolic therapies. A literature search was conducted with priority given to review articles, meta-analyses and well-designed large trials; paediatric studies were included where adult studies were lacking with the aim to review the advances in adult intensive care burn management and place them in the general context of day-to-day practical burn management.

Indexed as

BurnsBurn UnitsCritical CareCritical IllnessDisease ManagementHumansResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID24093225
PMCPMC4057496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.