Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24093180›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie2013

Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Jennifer H Acton, Vivienne C Greenstein

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Retinoblastoma and vision.Eye (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Looking Ahead: Visual and Anatomical Endpoints in Future Trials of Diabetic Macular Ischemia.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer H ActonSchool of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 4LU, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jenniferhacton@gmail.com.
Vivienne C Greenstein

Funding

MEASURES OF HUMAN RECEPTOR AND POST RECEPTOR ACTIVITYR01EY009076 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BIRCH, DAVID G, HOOD, DONALD C. · 1991 to 2021
$8.3M
Tests of Models of Retinal/Optic Nerve Diseases&AdaptionR01EY002115 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HOOD, DONALD C. · 1985 to 2018
$7.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002115NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009076NEI NIH HHS R01EY02115NEI NIH HHS R01EY09076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundus-driven perimetry, commonly known as microperimetry, is a technique for measuring visual field sensitivity, whilst simultaneously viewing the fundus. In this article, we review the technique, focusing on the MP-1 microperimeter (Nidek Instruments, Inc, Padua, Italy); we compare it with conventional static automated perimetry, emphasizing the importance of understanding the effects of the different stimulus conditions and data analyses on the interpretation of microperimetry data. The clinical applications of the technique, in the evaluation of functional and structural changes that accompany retinal diseases, are illustrated by its use in patients with age-related macular degeneration, Stargardt disease, and retinitis pigmentosa. In addition, the advantages and limitations of the technique are summarized.

Indexed as

Fundus OculiHumansMacular DegenerationRetinaRetinitis PigmentosaSensory ThresholdsStargardt DiseaseVision DisordersVisual FieldsVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID24093180
PMCPMC3792399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.