Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24093155›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2013

Bench-to-bedside review: future novel diagnostics for sepsis - a systems biology approach.

Simon Skibsted, Manoj K Bhasin, William C Aird, Nathan I Shapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Initial antimicrobial management of sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Unachievable zeros.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Article
  20. The Preseptic Period and Inflammatory Markers in the Prediction of the Course of Sepsis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simon Skibsted
Manoj K Bhasin
William C Aird
Nathan I Shapiro

Funding

Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS)P50GM076659 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ANGUS, DEREK C · 2006 to 2012
$11.2M
Biology of Tie2 in sepsisR01HL093234 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARIKH, SAMIR M · 2008 to 2017
$4.6M
Endothelial Cell Signaling and Microcirculatory Flow in Severe SepsisR01HL091757 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHAPIRO, NATHAN I · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL091757NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091757NHLBI NIH HHS SR01HL093234-02NIGMS NIH HHS GM076659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early, accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of sepsis remains an important challenge in the critically ill. Since traditional biomarker strategies have not yielded a gold standard marker for sepsis, focus is shifting towards novel strategies that improve assessment capabilities. The combination of technological advancements and information generated through the human genome project positions systems biology at the forefront of biomarker discovery. While previously available, developments in the technologies focusing on DNA, gene expression, gene regulatory mechanisms, protein and metabolite discovery have made these tools more feasible to implement and less costly, and they have taken on an enhanced capacity such that they are ripe for utilization as tools to advance our knowledge and clinical research. Medicine is in a genome-level era that can leverage the assessment of thousands of molecular signals beyond simply measuring selected circulating proteins. Genomics is the study of the entire complement of genetic material of an individual. Epigenetics is the regulation of gene activity by reversible modifications of the DNA. Transcriptomics is the quantification of the relative levels of messenger RNA for a large number of genes in specific cells or tissues to measure differences in the expression levels of different genes, and the utilization of patterns of differential gene expression to characterize different biological states of a tissue. Proteomics is the large-scale study of proteins. Metabolomics is the study of the small molecule profiles that are the terminal downstream products of the genome and consists of the total complement of all low-molecular-weight molecules that cellular processes leave behind. Taken together, these individual fields of study may be linked during a systems biology approach. There remains a valuable opportunity to deploy these technologies further in human research. The techniques described in this paper not only have the potential to increase the spectrum of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in sepsis, but they may also enable the discovery of new disease pathways. This may in turn lead us to improved therapeutic targets. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview and basic framework for clinicians and clinical researchers to better understand the 'omics technologies' to enhance further use of these valuable tools.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessSystems BiologyBiomarkersGenomicsHumansRisk AssessmentSepsisBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID24093155
PMCPMC4057467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.