ArticleInternational biodeterioration & biodegradation2013
Monitoring the effects of different conservation treatments on paper-infecting fungi.
Article in International biodeterioration & biodegradation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesoporous silica and vegetal extracts combined as sustainable stone heritage protection against biodeterioration.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Activity of Nano-GeOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Fungal biodeterioration and preservation of cultural heritage, artwork, and historical artifacts: extremophily and adaptation.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024Review
- Effects of ZnO/trimethylsilyl cellulose nano-composite coating on anti-UV and anti-fungal properties of papers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biotechnological development of Trichoderma-based formulations for biological control.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Novel eco-friendly [1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-a]isoquinoline chalcone derivatives efficiency against fungal deterioration of ancient Egyptian mummy cartonnage, Egypt.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Screening of Antifungal Activity of Essential Oils in Controlling Biocontamination of Historical Papers in Archives.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Unveiling the Occupational Exposure to Microbial Contamination in Conservation-Restoration Settings.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Microbial Contamination of Photographic and Cinematographic Materials in Archival Funds in the Czech Republic.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Formulation of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Controlled Release of Antimicrobials for Stone Preventive Conservation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Article
- The Microbiome of Leonardo da Vinci's Drawings: A Bio-Archive of Their History.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Microbial diversity in biodeteriorated Greek historical documents dating back to the 19th and 20th century: A case study.MicrobiologyOpen · 2018Article
- Melding the Old with the New: Trends in Methods Used to Identify, Monitor, and Control Microorganisms on Cultural Heritage Materials.Microbial ecology · 2018Review
- Quantification of fungal abundance on cultural heritage using real time PCR targeting the β-actin gene.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Article
- Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art--tilting at windmills?Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fungi are among the most degradative organisms inducing biodeterioration of paper-based items of cultural heritage. Appropriate conservation measures and restoration treatments to deal with fungal infections include mechanical, chemical, and biological methods, which entail effects on the paper itself and health hazards for humans. Three different conservation treatments, namely freeze-drying, gamma rays, and ethylene oxide fumigation, were compared and monitored to assess their short- (one month, T1) and long-term (one year, T2) effectiveness to inhibit fungal growth. After the inoculation with fungi possessing cellulose hydrolysis ability -
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.