Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24092362›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2014

Baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus baseline endomyocardial biopsy for the prediction of left ventricular reverse remodeling and prognosis in response to therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Takeru Nabeta, Takayuki Inomata, Yuichiro Iida, Yuki Ikeda, Miwa Iwamoto, Shunsuke Ishii, Takanori Sato, Ichiro Watanabe, Takashi Naruke, Hisahito Shinagawa and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance for predicting left ventricular reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyopathy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeru NabetaDepartment of Cardio-angiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan, srfaimx@yahoo.co.jp.
Takayuki Inomata
Yuichiro Iida
Yuki Ikeda
Miwa Iwamoto
Shunsuke Ishii
Takanori Sato
Ichiro Watanabe
Takashi Naruke
Hisahito Shinagawa
Toshimi Koitabashi
Ichiro Takeuchi
Mototsugu Nishii
Yusuke Inoue
Tohru Izumi
Kitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging performed at baseline are both used to evaluate the extent of myocardial fibrosis. However, no study has directly compared the effectiveness of these diagnostic tools in the prediction of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) and prognosis in response to therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). Seventy-five patients with newly diagnosed IDCM who were undergoing optimal therapy were assessed at baseline using LGE-CMR imaging and EMB; the former measured LGE area and the latter measured collagen volume fraction (CVF) as possible predictive indices of LVRR and cardiac event-free survival. Among all the baseline primary candidate factors with P < 0.2 as per univariate analysis, multivariate analysis indicated that only LGE area was an independent predictor of subsequent LVRR (β = 0.44; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.87-2.53; P < 0.001), as indicated by decreasing left ventricular end-systolic volume index over the 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated significantly lower cardiac event-free survival rates in patients with LGE at baseline than in patients without (P < 0.01). By contrast, there was no significant difference in prognosis between patients with CVF values above (severe fibrosis) and below (mild fibrosis) the median of 4.9 %. Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that LGE area was an independent predictor of subsequent cardiac events (hazard ratio 1.06; 95 % CI 1.02-1.10; P ≤ 0.01). The degree of myocardial fibrosis estimated by baseline LGE-CMR imaging, but not that estimated by baseline EMB, can predict LVRR and cardiac event-free survival in response to therapy in patients with newly diagnosed IDCM.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, DilatedGadolinium DTPAVentricular RemodelingAdultBiopsyComparative Effectiveness ResearchContrast MediaDisease-Free SurvivalEndocardiumFemaleFibrosisHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumContrast MediaGadolinium DTPA

Identifiers

PMID24092362
PMCPMC4226927
OpenAlexW2093070693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.