ArticleInvestigational new drugs2013
Phase I study of sunitinib plus capecitabine/cisplatin or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in advanced gastric cancer.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective phase II trial of pazopanib plus CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Trial
- PICK1 modulates the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells by regulating TLR4.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025Article
- Clinical advances and challenges of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Drug Delivery Opportunities in Esophageal Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospects.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Clinical progress of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy and combination therapy for gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- ANXA2 Silencing Inhibits Proliferation, Invasion, and Migration in Gastric Cancer Cells.Journal of oncology · 2019Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of angiogenesis blockade for the treatment of gastric cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2018Article
- Stomatitis and VEGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (VR-TKIs): A Review of Current Literature in 4369 Patients.BioMed research international · 2018Review
- New advances in targeted gastric cancer treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Targeted therapies in gastric cancer and future perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Molecular targeted therapy for the treatment of gastric cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2016Review
- Sunitinib: the antiangiogenic effects and beyond.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Review
- Trial Watch: Chemotherapy with immunogenic cell death inducers.Oncoimmunology · 2014Review
- Clinical response to sunitinib as a multitargeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) in solid cancers: a review of clinical trials.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Review
- Gastric Cancer Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of sunitinib plus capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) in Korean patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC).
methodsSunitinib (37.5 or 25 mg/day) was administered on a 2-week-on/1-week-off schedule with chemotherapy. Assessments included dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity.
resultsTwenty-eight patients received sunitinib/XP; 48 received sunitinib/XELOX. The MTDs were: sunitinib 25 mg/day, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2); sunitinib 37.5 mg/day, oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 800 mg/m(2); and sunitinib 25 mg/day, oxaliplatin 110 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2). DLTs at the MTDs comprised grade (G) 4 febrile neutropenia plus G3 diarrhea (n = 1; sunitinib/XP), dose delays due to hematologic toxicity (n = 2; both sunitinib/XP), G3 bleeding (menorrhagia; n = 1; sunitinib/XELOX), and G3 increased alanine aminotransferase levels (n = 1; sunitinib/XELOX). There was a high frequency of G3/4 hematologic adverse events observed with both treatment regimens, particularly with sunitinib/XP. Frequent non-hematologic, G3/4 adverse events were nausea, stomatitis, and hypophosphatemia with sunitinib/XP and hypophosphatemia and pulmonary embolism with sunitinib/XELOX. No drug-drug interactions were apparent. At the MTDs, median progression-free survival was 6.4 months and 5.5-8.0 months for sunitinib/XP and sunitinib/XELOX, respectively; and the objective response rate was 46.7% and 43.5-45.5% for sunitinib/XP and sunitinib/XELOX, respectively.
conclusionsAt the MTD, sunitinib/XELOX had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.