Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24091911›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2013

Postoperative complications and survival after gastric cancer surgery in patients older than 80 years of age.

Kazuhito Mita, Hideto Ito, Masatoshi Hashimoto, Ryo Murabayashi, Hideki Asakawa, Masashi Nabetani, Kazuya Koizumi, Takashi Hayashi, Keiichi Fujino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GASTRECTOMY IN OCTOGENARIANS WITH GASTRIC CANCER: IS IT FEASIBLE?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of advanced age on short-term outcomes following gastric cancer resection: an ACS-NSQIP analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kazuhito MitaDepartment of Surgery, New-Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matudo, Chiba, Japan, k-mita01@sth-medical.co.jp.
Hideto Ito
Masatoshi Hashimoto
Ryo Murabayashi
Hideki Asakawa
Masashi Nabetani
Kazuya Koizumi
Takashi Hayashi
Keiichi Fujino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study sought to identify and evaluate the risk factors of postoperative complications, prognostic factors, and appropriate surgical strategies in elderly patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer.

methodsThe medical records of 396 radical gastrectomies conducted from January 2006 to December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical results and survival rates were assessed for 60 elderly patients (aged ≥ 80 years) and 336 non-elderly patients (aged < 80 years). The study groups were compared with respect to clinicopathological findings, surgical outcomes, and survival.

resultsElderly patients underwent gastrectomies with shorter operation time, showed less extensive lymphadenectomy, and had a significant difference in overall survival compared with non-elderly patients, although there was no difference in cause-specific survival among patients receiving curative resection. No significant risk factors affecting postoperative complications were identified in the elderly patients. Number of comorbidities (≥2) (HR, 5.30; 95 % CI, 1.11-25.32; P = 0.037) and TNM stage (≥II) (HR, 12.97; 95 % CI, 1.60-105.38; P = 0.017) were identified as independent prognostic factors in the elderly patients receiving curative resection.

conclusionsAge is not an independent prognostic factor for patients receiving curative resection for gastric cancer. Multiple comorbidities may also influence the prognosis of elderly patients. Careful follow-up would improve overall survival for elderly patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantComorbidityFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.