ArticleIrish journal of medical science2014
Melanoma in primary care. The role of the general practitioner.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Melanoma Screening in Primary Care: The Experience of the Association of French General Practitioners Practicing Dermoscopy.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- Measuring the quality of skin cancer management in primary care: A scoping review.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2023Article
- Short- and Long-Term Evaluation of General Practitioners' Competences After a Training in Melanoma Diagnosis: Refresher Training Sessions May Be Needed.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Early Melanoma Detection in Primary Care: Clinical Recognition of Melanoma is Not Enough, One Must Also Learn the Basics.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Training general practitioners in melanoma diagnosis: a scoping review of the literature.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe British Association of Dermatologists and the National Cancer Control Programme in Ireland discourage all GPs from biopsying any lesions suspicious of melanoma.
aimThe aim of this study was to assess whether or not it is safe and practical for a general practitioner with extra training in dermatology and skin surgery to assess suspicious skin lesions and treat low risk melanomas.
methodThe outcome of 56 new melanomas (31 invasive, 7 in situ and 18 lentigo maligna) in 53 patients, managed by a GP with extra training in dermatology and skin surgery, over a 20 year period, was examined.
resultsForty-eight (86 %) of the melanomas had the initial biopsy carried out in primary care. The average time from presentation to the practice to the date of the biopsy was 8 days for the in situ and invasive melanomas and 17 days for the lentigo malignas. Twenty-eight (50 %) of the melanomas were considered low risk (in situ, invasive <1 mm deep or lentigo maligna) and were treated successfully in primary care according to the Australian and New Zealand guidelines, without any surgical complications.
conclusionGPs with extra training in skin cancer and skin surgery could assess most suspicious skin lesions with dermoscopy and if necessary, biopsy most of these lesions in primary care. This would lead to a quicker diagnosis, more rapid pathway to definitive treatment, lower cost and more convenience to the patient, especially for those living in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.