ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2015
Validity of Clinician's Self-Reported Practice Elements on the Monthly Treatment and Progress Summary.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapist Self-Report of Fidelity to Core Elements of Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems: Psychometrics of a Pragmatic Quality Indicator Tool.Administration and policy in mental health · 2022Trial
- Therapist self-report reliability and accuracy in individual vs. conjoint systemic family therapy sessions: implications for clinical monitoring.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Youth-Focused Cognitive and Behavioral Therapy Adherence Measure: A Multi-Informant, Transdiagnostic, Trans-Manual, Adherence Monitoring Tool.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Article
- Validating a Pragmatic Measure of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Delivery: Therapist Reports of EBP Strategy Delivery and Associations with Child Outcome Trajectories.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- Article
- Measuring Evidence-Based Treatment Strategies in Youth Community Mental Health Care: the Evidence-Based Strategies Scale.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2022Article
- Therapist-Observer Concordance in Ratings of EBP Strategy Delivery: Challenges and Targeted Directions in Pursuing Pragmatic Measurement in Children's Mental Health Services.Administration and policy in mental health · 2021Article
- Medical Image Enhancement by a Bilateral Filter Using Optimization Technique.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Evidence-Based Treatment Strategies in Youth Mental Health Services: Results from a National Survey of Providers.Administration and policy in mental health · 2019Article
- Overlapping and Non-overlapping Practices in Usual and Evidence-Based Care for Youth Anxiety.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2017Article
- The impact of implementation climate on community mental health clinicians' attitudes toward exposure: An evaluation of the effects of training and consultation.Implementation research and practiceArticle
- Testing Three Alternate Methods to Direct Observation in Measuring Use of Discrete Youth Cognitive Behavioral Techniques: A Secondary Analysis.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An increased demand for accountability in community mental health systems has resulted in a need for valid, reliable measures of therapeutic practice. The Monthly Treatment and Progress Summary (MTPS), developed through the Hawaii Child and Adolescent Mental Health Division, is a clinician-report measure that describes therapeutic practices, treatment targets, and progress ratings for each treatment case. The current study evaluated the validity of the therapeutic strategies reported on the MTPS by comparing coder- and clinician-reported use of practices. Using 47 audio recordings from 19 youths' therapy sessions, trained observers reliably coded 12 discrete practices. Four of the 12 practices were found to be valid according to clinician-coder agreement (intraclass correlations ≥0.60). The coding system was revised, utilizing extensiveness and experiential scales, and 100 % of practices were valid according to clinician-coder agreement. Practical use of the MTPS, implications for service systems, and future directions for research on the MTPS are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24091609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.