Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24091564›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2014

Long-term efficacy of electrical pudendal nerve stimulation for urgency-frequency syndrome in women.

Siyou Wang, Shujing Zhang, Lin Zhao

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02311634 nacompletednot on this map

A Comparison of Efficacies of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation Versus Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation in Treating Urge Incontinence

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Institute of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and MeridianRan2014 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsUrge Urinary IncontinenceArmsElectrical pudendal nerve stimulation, Transvaginal ES
NCT02517996 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Use of Preemptive Pudendal Nerve Block Prior to Hydrodistension for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Painful Bladder Syndrome (IC/PBS): a Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2015 to 2018Enrolled18ConditionsInterstitial Cystitis, Painful Bladder SyndromeArmsLidocaine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siyou WangClinical Research Section, Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian, 650 south Wanping road, Shanghai, 200030, China, wangsiyou1234@163.com.
Shujing Zhang
Lin Zhao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisElectrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS) was developed by combining the advantages of pudendal neuromodulation (PNM) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and incorporating the technique of deep insertion of long acupuncture needles. The purpose of this study is to show the long-term efficacy of EPNS in treating urgency-frequency syndrome (UFS) in women.

methodsOne hundred and six consecutive female UFS patients were enrolled and treated with EPNS. Long acupuncture needles were deeply inserted into four sacral points and electrified to stimulate the pudendal nerves. Evaluation of therapeutic effects was based on a questionnaire (including questions on storage, voiding, and postmicturition symptoms). Patients with ≥50 % posttreatment symptom improvement were followed up for at least 60 months.

resultsComplete resolution and ≥50 % improvement rate were 42.5 % and 85.8 %, respectively, in the 106 patients after a mean of 21.2 sessions of EPNS treatment. Of the 91 patients with ≥50 % posttreatment improvement, 62 (29 with complete resolution, 15 with marked improvement, and 18 with moderate improvement) were available for follow-up at 60-126 (mean 99.5; median 98) months after the end of EPNS treatment. Of these 62 patients, 35 maintained the posttreatment effect, 18 changed from better to complete resolution, and seven changed back to <50 % improvement; only four of whom changed to <25 % improvement.

conclusionsEPNS combines the advantages of PNM (better effect) and PTNS (minimally invasive, easily applicable, and well tolerated) in treating UFS. It has a good long-term therapeutic effect on UFS in women.

Indexed as

Pudendal NerveAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeedlesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUrination Disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.