ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2014
Unilateral posterior cervical spinal cord infarction due to spontaneous vertebral artery dissection.
Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microvascular anatomy of the lateral spinal artery: Origins, collateral channels, and other anatomical variations.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Case Report: Anterior Spinal Cord Ischemia Following Embolization of Cerebellar Arteriovenous Malformation: An Illustrative Case and Review of Spinal Cord Vascular Anatomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Case Report with Literature Review.Case reports in medicine · 2020Article
- Cervical Cord Infarction Caused by Dissection of the Intracranial Segment of the Vertebral Artery.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Article
- Spontaneous posterior spinal artery infarction: An under-recognized cause of acute myelopathy.Neurology · 2018Article
- Unilateral Upper Cervical Posterior Spinal Cord Infarction after a Neuroendovascular Intervention: A Case Report.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2018Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Features in Acute and Subacute Myelopathies.Clinical neuroradiology · 2017Review
- Spinal cord ischemia: aetiology, clinical syndromes and imaging features.Neuroradiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextIschemia of the cervical spinal cord is a rare complication of spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (VAD) and usually involves the ventral portion. We describe a less evocative clinical presentation and images of unilateral posterior spinal cord infarction due to spontaneous VAD in order to facilitate early diagnosis.
findingsA previously fit 30-year-old man presented with persistent headaches and proximal motor deficit of the right arm. He was diagnosed with spontaneous dissection of both vertebral arteries, with occlusion of the right one, and the right carotid artery. Neurological examination also revealed a right C2-C3 tactile sensory loss, with unilateral proprioceptive deficit below. Brain images revealed small bilateral cerebellar infarcts which could not be responsible for the clinical symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord showed a right posterior cervical spinal cord infarction. The patient achieved nearly complete recovery after several weeks of anticoagulation and rehabilitation. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Infarction of the caudal portion of the cervical spinal cord, especially unilateral, caused by spontaneous VAD, has rarely been described and is certainly under-diagnosed due to less suggestive symptoms, like unilateral and mainly sensory deficit. Nevertheless, early diagnosis of this condition is important to guide patient management and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.