ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2013
A quantitative measure for protein conformational heterogeneity.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Features of a Tiny Viral Protein, ORF7b of SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Toward a unified framework for determining conformational ensembles of disordered proteins.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Article
- Molecular grammars of predicted intrinsically disordered regions that span the human proteome.Cell · 2026Article
- Steroids fromMolecular biology research communications · 2026Article
- Critical Assessment of Protein Intrinsic Disorder Round 3 - Predicting Disorder in the Era of Protein Language Models.Proteins · 2026Article
- Biomolecular Condensates as Emerging Biomaterials: Functional Mechanisms and Advances in Computational and Experimental Approaches.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Drug resistance and tumor heterogeneity: cells and ensembles.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Phase Transitions of Associative Biomacromolecules.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Functional roles of enzyme dynamics in accelerating active site chemistry: Emerging techniques and changing concepts.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Exploring Nearest Neighbor Interactions and Their Influence on the Gibbs Energy Landscape of Unfolded Proteins and Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Competing interactions give rise to two-state behavior and switch-like transitions in charge-rich intrinsically disordered proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- AlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Uncovering Non-random Binary Patterns Within Sequences of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Journal of molecular biology · 2022Article
- Exploring the conformational dynamics and flexibility of intrinsically disordered HIV-1 Nef protein using molecular dynamic network approaches.3 Biotech · 2021Article
- Short peptides as predictors for the structure of polyarginine sequences in disordered proteins.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- High resolution ensemble description of metamorphic and intrinsically disordered proteins using an efficient hybrid parallel tempering scheme.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Snapshotting the transient conformations and tracing the multiple pathways of single peptide folding using a solid-state nanopore.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Glycine in Water Favors the Polyproline II State.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conformational heterogeneity is a defining characteristic of proteins. Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and denatured state ensembles are extreme manifestations of this heterogeneity. Inferences regarding globule versus coil formation can be drawn from analysis of polymeric properties such as average size, shape, and density fluctuations. Here we introduce a new parameter to quantify the degree of conformational heterogeneity within an ensemble to complement polymeric descriptors. The design of this parameter is guided by the need to distinguish between systems that couple their unfolding-folding transitions with coil-to-globule transitions and those systems that undergo coil-to-globule transitions with no evidence of acquiring a homogeneous ensemble of conformations upon collapse. The approach is as follows: Each conformation in an ensemble is converted into a conformational vector where the elements are inter-residue distances. Similarity between pairs of conformations is quantified using the projection between the corresponding conformational vectors. An ensemble of conformations yields a distribution of pairwise projections, which is converted into a distribution of pairwise conformational dissimilarities. The first moment of this dissimilarity distribution is normalized against the first moment of the distribution obtained by comparing conformations from the ensemble of interest to conformations drawn from a Flory random coil model. The latter sets an upper bound on conformational heterogeneity thus ensuring that the proposed measure for intra-ensemble heterogeneity is properly calibrated and can be used to compare ensembles for different sequences and across different temperatures. The new measure of conformational heterogeneity will be useful in quantitative studies of coupled folding and binding of IDPs and in de novo sequence design efforts that are geared toward controlling the degree of heterogeneity in unbound forms of IDPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.