Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24089705›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2013

Evaluating human cancer cell metastasis in zebrafish.

Yong Teng, Xiayang Xie, Steven Walker, David T White, Jeff S Mumm, John K Cowell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Small Fish, Big Answers: Zebrafish and the Molecular Drivers of Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. SETD7 functions as a transcription repressor in prostate cancer via methylating FOXA1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Zebrafish Models of Paediatric Brain Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yong TengCancer Center, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA. yteng@gru.edu.
Xiayang Xie
Steven Walker
David T White
Jeff S Mumm
John K Cowell
Augusta University · USGeorgia Regents Medical Center · US

Funding

Functional analysis of the WAVE3 geneR01CA120510 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI COWELL, JOHN K · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA120510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn vivo metastasis assays have traditionally been performed in mice, but the process is inefficient and costly. However, since zebrafish do not develop an adaptive immune system until 14 days post-fertilization, human cancer cells can survive and metastasize when transplanted into zebrafish larvae. Despite isolated reports, there has been no systematic evaluation of the robustness of this system to date.

methodsIndividual cell lines were stained with CM-Dil and injected into the perivitelline space of 2-day old zebrafish larvae. After 2-4 days fish were imaged using confocal microscopy and the number of metastatic cells was determined using Fiji software.

resultsTo determine whether zebrafish can faithfully report metastatic potential in human cancer cells, we injected a series of cells with different metastatic potential into the perivitelline space of 2 day old embryos. Using cells from breast, prostate, colon and pancreas we demonstrated that the degree of cell metastasis in fish is proportional to their invasion potential in vitro. Highly metastatic cells such as MDA231, DU145, SW620 and ASPC-1 are seen in the vasculature and throughout the body of the fish after only 24-48 hours. Importantly, cells that are not invasive in vitro such as T47D, LNCaP and HT29 do not metastasize in fish. Inactivation of JAK1/2 in fibrosarcoma cells leads to loss of invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo, and in zebrafish these cells show limited spread throughout the zebrafish body compared with the highly metastatic parental cells. Further, knockdown of WASF3 in DU145 cells which leads to loss of invasion in vitro and metastasis in vivo also results in suppression of metastasis in zebrafish. In a cancer progression model involving normal MCF10A breast epithelial cells, the degree of invasion/metastasis in vitro and in mice is mirrored in zebrafish. Using a modified version of Fiji software, it is possible to quantify individual metastatic cells in the transparent larvae to correlate with invasion potential. We also demonstrate, using lung cancers, that the zebrafish model can evaluate the metastatic ability of cancer cells isolated from primary tumors.

conclusionsThe zebrafish model described here offers a rapid, robust, and inexpensive means of evaluating the metastatic potential of human cancer cells. Using this model it is possible to critically evaluate whether genetic manipulation of signaling pathways affects metastasis and whether primary tumors contain metastatic cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansJanus KinasesMaleMiceNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsPhenotypeProtein KinasesWiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein FamilyZebrafishJanus KinasesProtein KinasesWiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Family

Identifiers

PMID24089705
PMCPMC3852235
OpenAlexW2158062858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.