Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24089495›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Imaging social motivation: distinct brain mechanisms drive effort production during collaboration versus competition.

Raphaël Le Bouc, Mathias Pessiglione

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nucleus accumbens dichotomically controls social dominance in male mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Glutamine-to-glutamate ratio in the nucleus accumbens predicts effort-based motivated performance in humans.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural Mechanisms of Social Cognition in Primates.Annual review of neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mitochondrial function in the brain links anxiety with social subordination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  20. Right Frontoinsular Cortex and Subcortical Activity to Infant Cry Is Associated with Maternal Mental State Talk.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raphaël Le BoucÉquipe "Motivation, Cerveau et Comportement", Centre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, F-75013, Paris, France, and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 975, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité 7225, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, F-75005 Paris, France.
Mathias Pessiglione

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative and competitive interactions have been investigated extensively so as to understand how the brain makes choices in the context of strategic games, yet such interactions are known to influence a more basic dimension of behavior: the energy invested in the task. The cognitive mechanisms that motivate effort production in social situations remain poorly understood, and their neural counterparts have not been explored so far. A dominant idea is that the motivation provided by the social context is reducible to the personal utility of effort production, which decreases in collaboration and increases in competition. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we scanned human participants while they produced a physical effort in a collaborative or competitive context. We found that motivation was indeed primarily driven by personal utility, which was reflected in brain regions devoted to reward processing (the ventral basal ganglia). However, subjects who departed from utility maximization, working more in collaborative situations, showed greater functional activation and anatomical volume in a brain region implicated previously in social cognition (the temporoparietal junction). Therefore, this region might mediate a purely pro-social motivation to produce greater effort in the context of collaboration. More generally, our findings suggest that the individual propensity to invest energy in collaborative work might have an identifiable counterpart in the brain functional architecture.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAdultBrainBrain MappingCompetitive BehaviorFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationReward

Identifiers

PMID24089495
PMCPMC6618480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.