Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24089004›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2014

Adenosine receptor antagonists effect on plasma-enhanced killing.

Gustavo Bauzá, Rituparna Moitra, Daniel Remick

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gustavo BauzáDepartments of *Surgery and †Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rituparna Moitra
Daniel Remick
Boston University · US

Funding

Impact of Biological, Clinical, and Social Determinants on Trauma and Trauma OutcomesT32GM086308 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Alik Farber, Daniel G. Remick · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
Role of Cytokines in Sepsis and TraumaR01GM082962 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI REMICK, DANIEL G. · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
Adenosine and Oxygen Modulate Antimicrobial DefensesR01GM097320 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI REMICK, DANIEL G., SITKOVSKY, MICHAIL · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
ROLE OF CYTOKINES IN SEPSIS AND TRAUMAR01GM044918 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REMICK, DANIEL G. · 1990 to 2004
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044918NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 082962NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082962NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097320NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086308NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM 86308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that naive plasma has inherent capabilities to enhance bacterial opsonization and phagocyte killing, but not all plasma is equally effective. This raised the question of whether plasma constituents other than opsonins may play a role. Adenosine receptor antagonists have been shown to modulate cytokine response and survival in mice after a bacterial challenge. We investigated whether selective adenosine receptor blockade would influence the ability of naive plasma to effectively control bacterial growth. Colonic bacteria- and thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages and neutrophils were obtained from naive mice. Stock murine plasma from naive was purchased and categorized as having high plasma-enhanced bacterial killing capacity using our previously described methods. Bacteria and plasma were incubated to allow for opsonization and then added to macrophages previously exposed to selected adenosine receptor antagonists: ZM 241385: A2A, MRS1754: A2B, DPCPX: A1, and MRS1220: A3. The final mixture was plated on blood agar plates in aerobic and anaerobic conditions and bacterial colony-forming units quantified after 24 h. This study demonstrated that exogenous adenosine was able to significantly decrease phagocyte killing of cecal bacteria. Blocking adenosine receptors with selective antagonists altered the bacterial killing capacity of plasma. Selectively blocking the A1, A2A, or A2B receptors proved most beneficial at reversing the effect of adenosine. Consistent with previous work, only macrophage killing of bacteria could be modulated by adenosine receptor blockade because neutrophils were unaffected. These data demonstrate that adenosine decreases macrophage killing of enteric bacteria and that this effect is mediated through the adenosine receptors.

Indexed as

AdenosineAnimalsBlood Bactericidal ActivityCells, CulturedColonColony Count, MicrobialFemaleMacrophages, PeritonealMiceMice, Inbred ICRPeritoneal LavagePhagocytosisPlasmaPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsSepsisSerum Bactericidal TestAdenosinePurinergic P1 Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID24089004
PMCPMC3896973
OpenAlexW1989559584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.