Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24088989›Full record

ReviewShock (Augusta, Ga.)2013

Role of biomarkers in sepsis care.

Ravi S Samraj, Basilia Zingarelli, Hector R Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ravi S SamrajDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and The University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Basilia Zingarelli
Hector R Wong

Funding

PPARgamma and PPARgamma agonists in septic shockR01GM067202 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI ZINGARELLI, BASILIA · 2003 to 2015
$3.9M
Novel diagnostic and stratification tools for septic shockR01GM108025 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Mechanisms of age-related inflammatory response in hemorrhagic shockR01AG027990 · NIA · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI ZINGARELLI, BASILIA · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
Stratification of pediatric septic shockR01GM099773 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
MMP-8 as a novel therapeutic target in sepsisR01GM096994 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WONG, HECTOR R. · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG-027990NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027990NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM-067202NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067202NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM-096994NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096994NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM-099773NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099773NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity, even with the current availability of extended-spectrum antibiotics and advanced medical care. Biomarkers offer a tool in facilitating early diagnosis, in identifying patient populations at high risk of complications, and in monitoring progression of the disease, which are critical assessments for appropriate therapy and improvement in patient outcomes. Several biomarkers are already available for clinical use in sepsis; however, their effectiveness in many instances is limited by the lack of specificity and sensitivity to characterize the presence of an infection and the complexity of the inflammatory and immune processes and to stratify patients into homogenous groups for specific treatments. Current advances in molecular techniques have provided new tools facilitating the discovery of novel biomarkers, which can vary from metabolites and chemical products present in body fluids to genes and proteins in circulating blood cells. The purpose of this review was to examine the current status of sepsis biomarkers, with special emphasis on emerging markers, which are undergoing validation and may transition into clinical practice for their informative value in diagnosis, prognosis, or response to therapy. We will also discuss the new concept of combination biomarkers and biomarker risk models, their existing challenges, and their potential use in the daily management of patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninDrug MonitoringEarly DiagnosisHumansImmunity, InnateInflammation MediatorsPrognosisProtein PrecursorsSepsisSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninInflammation MediatorsProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID24088989
PMCPMC3806047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.