Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24088744›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2013

To be or not to be assembled: progressing into nuclear actin filaments.

Robert Grosse, Maria K Vartiainen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nuclear actin is a critical regulator ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mechanical Forces in Nuclear Organization.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A light way for nuclear cell biologists.Journal of biochemistry · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert GrosseBiochemical-Pharmacological Center (BPC), Institute of Pharmacology, University of Marburg, 35043 Germany.
Maria K Vartiainen
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradigm states that cytoplasmic actin operates as filaments and nuclear actin is mainly monomeric, acting as a scaffold in transcription complexes. However, why should a powerful function of actin, namely polymerization, not be used in the nucleus? Recent progress in the field forces us to rethink this issue, as many actin filament assembly proteins have been linked to nuclear functions and new experimental approaches have provided the first direct visualizations of polymerized nuclear actin.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsCell NucleusHumansModels, BiologicalPolymerization

Identifiers

PMID24088744
OpenAlexW2074075770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.