Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24088736›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

Photodynamic therapy with 3-(1'-hexyloxyethyl) pyropheophorbide a for cancer of the oral cavity.

Nestor Rigual, Gal Shafirstein, Michele T Cooper, Heinz Baumann, David A Bellnier, Ulas Sunar, Erin C Tracy, Daniel J Rohrbach, Gregory Wilding, Wei Tan and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Photodynamic therapy in oral cancer: a review of clinical studies.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Impact of mono- and di-β-galactose moieties inEuropean journal of medicinal chemistry reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nestor RigualAuthors' Affiliations: Photodynamic Therapy Center at the Department of Cell Stress Biology, Departments of Head and Neck Surgery, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Dentistry, and Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI), Buffalo, New York.
Gal Shafirstein
Michele T Cooper
Heinz Baumann
David A Bellnier
Ulas Sunar
Erin C Tracy
Daniel J Rohrbach
Gregory Wilding
Wei Tan
Maureen Sullivan
Mihai Merzianu
Barbara W Henderson

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
StatisticsP01CA055791 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GOLLNICK, SANDRA O. · 1992 to 2019
$36.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055791NCI NIH HHS P01CA55791NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P30CA16056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary objective was to evaluate safety of 3-(1'-hexyloxyethyl)pyropheophorbide-a (HPPH) photodynamic therapy (HPPH-PDT) for dysplasia and early squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). Secondary objectives were the assessment of treatment response and reporters for an effective PDT reaction. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients with histologically proven oral dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or early-stage HNSCC were enrolled in two sequentially conducted dose escalation studies with an expanded cohort at the highest dose level. These studies used an HPPH dose of 4 mg/m(2) and light doses from 50 to 140 J/cm(2). Pathologic tumor responses were assessed at 3 months. Clinical follow up range was 5 to 40 months. PDT induced cross-linking of STAT3 were assessed as potential indicators of PDT effective reaction.

resultsForty patients received HPPH-PDT. Common adverse events were pain and treatment site edema. Biopsy proven complete response rates were 46% for dysplasia and carcinoma in situ and 82% for squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) lesions at 140 J/cm(2). The responses in the carcinoma in situ/dysplasia cohort are not durable. The PDT-induced STAT3 cross-links is significantly higher (P = 0.0033) in SCC than in carcinoma in situ/dysplasia for all light doses.

conclusionHPPH-PDT is safe for the treatment of carcinoma in situ/dysplasia and early-stage cancer of the oral cavity. Early-stage oral HNSCC seems to respond better to HPPH-PDT in comparison with premalignant lesions. The degree of STAT3 cross-linking is a significant reporter to evaluate HPPH-PDT-mediated photoreaction.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellChlorophyllDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsSTAT3 Transcription FactorTissue DistributionTreatment Outcome2-(1-hexyloxyethyl)-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-aChlorophyllPhotosensitizing AgentsSTAT3 protein, humanSTAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID24088736
PMCPMC3911775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.