Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24088386›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2013

Probable medications overuse headaches: validation of a brief easy-to-use screening tool in a headache centre.

Virginie Dousset, Martial Maud, Mélanie Legoff, Françoise Radat, Bruno Brochet, Jean-François Dartigues, Tobias Kurth

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Medication overuse headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginie DoussetCentre Douleur Chronique, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33 076 Bordeaux, Cedex, France. virginie.dousset@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Martial Maud
Mélanie Legoff
Françoise Radat
Bruno Brochet
Jean-François Dartigues
Tobias Kurth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo validate a rapid questionnaire as a screening tool, because application of the diagnostic revised criteria of the ICHD-II for medication overuse headache (MOH) requires experience for the physician and is time-consuming.

methodsICHD-II criteria for probable MOH (pMOH) were transformed in questions formulated in such a way that they could be self-administered, easily understood, and quickly filled out. We compared this questionnaire to the gold standard: the diagnosis made by headache specialists, based on the the ICHD-II criteria. Patients who were consulting for pMOH or migraine for the first time were consecutively included. As validity indicators, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the items.

resultsSeventy-nine patients were screened, 77 included, 2 female patients excluded. Forty-two patients have been considered as suffering from pMOH, 35 patients suffered from migraine without medication overuse. The association of the question "do you take a treatment for attacks more than 10 days per month" and the question "is this intake on a regular basis?" had a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 80%.

conclusionThis screening tool can detect pMOH with a sensitivity that could be of interest to screen patients in clinical practice and to pre-include patients for research as epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsFemaleHeadacheHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID24088386
PMCPMC3850931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.