ArticleErgonomics2013
SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients.
Article in Ergonomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07430813 (Drone Delivery of Automated External Defibrillators to Lay Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 498 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Drone Delivery of Automated External Defibrillators to Lay Users (DAEDALUS): A Proof of Concept Study
Who cites it
498 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Blurred Boundaries at the Bedside: Reframing Problematic Smartphone Use as an Ethical and Organisational Challenge in Nursing Practice.Nursing open · 2026Pooled it
- Systems Factors Contributing to Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Health: A Systematic Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Pooled it
- Global trends and thematic clusters in healthcare professional education, medical errors, and patient safety: a bibliometric analysis, 2000-2026.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Conventions and research challenges in considering trust with socially assistive robots for older adults.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Pooled it
- Resilience in nursing medication administration practice: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.BMJ open quality · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Medication administration errors in a Norwegian ambulance service: a quasi-experimental study on the impact of a team training program.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Trial
- Evaluating the sustained effectiveness of a novel pharmacy-based intervention to reduce older adult misuse of over-the-counter medications: A case for non-significance.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2025Trial
- Beyond the Document: A Single-Center Qualitative Study of Survivorship Care Plan Barriers and Opportunities Across Pediatric Oncology Stakeholders.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2026Article
- Clinician Trust and Human Factors in AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support in Acute Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Single maintenance and reliever therapy strategies for Implementation and effectiveness trial (SMART & SIMPLE Trial): study protocol for a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Effects of electronic health records implementation on workflow and health care provider outcomes: a prospective, multi-professional cohort study.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Usability and Workflow Integration of a Machine Learning-Derived Neonatal Risk Predictor in Kenyan Neonatal Units: Multisite User-Centered Pilot Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- A qualitative human factors investigation of the impact of intraoperative CT-based navigation on interprofessional work in the operating theatre.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- PEAK-II Trach: A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement/Simulation Study Assessing Pediatric Emergency Readiness.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- A Conceptual Model for Ambient AI Adoption: Perspectives From Academia and Industry.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Understanding the Limits of Patient Safety Classification Systems for Health Information Technology-Related Incidents.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- No effect of learning from excellence on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.BMC health services research · 2026Observational
- Latent profiles and network characteristics of perceived patient safety culture among emergency and critical care nurses: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- "I don't like fitting a box, except the box I am": genderqueer and nonbinary (GQNB) patient strategies for navigating healthcare.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
438 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healthcare practitioners, patient safety leaders, educators and researchers increasingly recognise the value of human factors/ergonomics and make use of the discipline's person-centred models of sociotechnical systems. This paper first reviews one of the most widely used healthcare human factors systems models, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, and then introduces an extended model, 'SEIPS 2.0'. SEIPS 2.0 incorporates three novel concepts into the original model: configuration, engagement and adaptation. The concept of configuration highlights the dynamic, hierarchical and interactive properties of sociotechnical systems, making it possible to depict how health-related performance is shaped at 'a moment in time'. Engagement conveys that various individuals and teams can perform health-related activities separately and collaboratively. Engaged individuals often include patients, family caregivers and other non-professionals. Adaptation is introduced as a feedback mechanism that explains how dynamic systems evolve in planned and unplanned ways. Key implications and future directions for human factors research in healthcare are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.