Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24086607›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Plasma IgG to linear epitopes in the V2 and V3 regions of HIV-1 gp120 correlate with a reduced risk of infection in the RV144 vaccine efficacy trial.

Raphael Gottardo, Robert T Bailer, Bette T Korber, S Gnanakaran, Joshua Phillips, Xiaoying Shen, Georgia D Tomaras, Ellen Turk, Gregory Imholte, Larry Eckler and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Raphael GottardoFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Robert T Bailer
Bette T Korber
S Gnanakaran
Joshua Phillips
Xiaoying Shen
Georgia D Tomaras
Ellen Turk
Gregory Imholte
Larry Eckler
Holger Wenschuh
Johannes Zerweck
Kelli Greene
Hongmei Gao
Phillip W Berman
Donald Francis
Faruk Sinangil
Carter Lee
Sorachai Nitayaphan
Supachai Rerks-Ngarm
Jaranit Kaewkungwal
Punnee Pitisuttithum
James Tartaglia
Merlin L Robb
Nelson L Michael
Jerome H Kim
Susan Zolla-Pazner
Barton F Haynes
John R Mascola
Steve Self
Peter Gilbert
David C Montefiori
Duke Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USGlobal Solutions for Infectious Diseases · USJPT Peptide Technologies (Germany) · DELos Alamos National Laboratory · USNational Institutes of Health · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · USArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THMahidol University · THMinistry of Public Health · THNew York University · USSanofi (United States) · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies to linear epitopes on HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins have potential to mediate antiviral effector functions that could be beneficial to vaccine-induced protection. Here, plasma IgG responses were assessed in three HIV-1 gp120 vaccine efficacy trials (RV144, Vax003, Vax004) and in HIV-1-infected individuals by using arrays of overlapping peptides spanning the entire consensus gp160 of all major genetic subtypes and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) of the virus. In RV144, where 31.2% efficacy against HIV-1 infection was seen, dominant responses targeted the C1, V2, V3 and C5 regions of gp120. An analysis of RV144 case-control samples showed that IgG to V2 CRF01_AE significantly inversely correlated with infection risk (OR= 0.54, p=0.0042), as did the response to other V2 subtypes (OR=0.60-0.63, p=0.016-0.025). The response to V3 CRF01_AE also inversely correlated with infection risk but only in vaccine recipients who had lower levels of other antibodies, especially Env-specific plasma IgA (OR=0.49, p=0.007) and neutralizing antibodies (OR=0.5, p=0.008). Responses to C1 and C5 showed no significant correlation with infection risk. In Vax003 and Vax004, where no significant protection was seen, serum IgG responses targeted the same epitopes as in RV144 with the exception of an additional C1 reactivity in Vax003 and infrequent V2 reactivity in Vax004. In HIV-1 infected subjects, dominant responses targeted the V3 and C5 regions of gp120, as well as the immunodominant domain, heptad repeat 1 (HR-1) and membrane proximal external region (MPER) of gp41. These results highlight the presence of several dominant linear B cell epitopes on the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. They also generate the hypothesis that IgG to linear epitopes in the V2 and V3 regions of gp120 are part of a complex interplay of immune responses that contributed to protection in RV144.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, ViralB-LymphocytesCase-Control StudiesEpitopesHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Envelope Protein gp41HIV InfectionsHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMolecular Sequence DataAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, ViralEpitopesgp41 protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV AntibodiesHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV Envelope Protein gp41Immunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID24086607
PMCPMC3784573
OpenAlexW2002116074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.