Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24086532›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Chl1 DNA helicase regulates Scc2 deposition specifically during DNA-replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Soumya Rudra, Robert V Skibbens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of the DDX11 DNA Helicase in Warsaw Breakage Syndrome Etiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spotlight on Warsaw Breakage Syndrome.The application of clinical genetics · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soumya RudraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Robert V Skibbens
Lehigh University · US

Funding

DNA helicase functions in genome maintenanceR15GM110631 · NIGMS · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI SKIBBENS, ROBERT · 2014 to 2017
$803k
Mechanisms of Sister Chromatid PairingR15GM083269 · NIGMS · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI SKIBBENS, ROBERT · 2008 to 2011
$522k
NIGMS NIH HHS 2R15GM083269-02NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM083269NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM110631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conserved family of cohesin proteins that mediate sister chromatid cohesion requires Scc2, Scc4 for chromatin-association and Eco1/Ctf7 for conversion to a tethering competent state. A popular model, based on the notion that cohesins form huge ring-like structures, is that Scc2, Scc4 function is essential only during G1 such that sister chromatid cohesion results simply from DNA replisome passage through pre-loaded cohesin rings. In such a scenario, cohesin deposition during G1 is temporally uncoupled from Eco1-dependent establishment reactions that occur during S-phase. Chl1 DNA helicase (homolog of human ChlR1/DDX11 and BACH1/BRIP1/FANCJ helicases implicated in Fanconi anemia, breast and ovarian cancer and Warsaw Breakage Syndrome) plays a critical role in sister chromatid cohesion, however, the mechanism through which Chl1 promotes cohesion remains poorly understood. Here, we report that Chl1 promotes Scc2 loading unto DNA such that both Scc2 and cohesin enrichment to chromatin are defective in chl1 mutant cells. The results further show that both Chl1 expression and chromatin-recruitment are tightly regulated through the cell cycle, peaking during S-phase. Importantly, kinetic ChIP studies reveals that Chl1 is required for Scc2 chromatin-association specifically during S-phase, but not during G1. Despite normal chromatin enrichment of both Scc2 and cohesin during G1, chl1 mutant cells exhibit severe chromosome segregation and cohesion defects--revealing that G1-loaded cohesins is insufficient to promote cohesion. Based on these findings, we propose a new model wherein S-phase cohesin loading occurs during DNA replication and in concert with both cohesion establishment and chromatin assembly reactions--challenging the notion that DNA replication fork navigates through or around pre-loaded cohesin rings.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAcetylationCell Cycle ProteinsChromatidsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA HelicasesDNA ReplicationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCHL1 protein, S cerevisiaeChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSCC2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID24086532
PMCPMC3784445
OpenAlexW2004477658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.