Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24086454›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Selection of single domain antibodies from immune libraries displayed on the surface of E. coli cells with two β-domains of opposite topologies.

Valencio Salema, Elvira Marín, Rocio Martínez-Arteaga, David Ruano-Gallego, Sofía Fraile, Yago Margolles, Xema Teira, Carlos Gutierrez, Gustavo Bodelón, Luis Ángel Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A programmableApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tuning of G-CSFR signaling by de novo-designed agonists.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Proximity biotinylation at the host-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Valencio SalemaDepartment of Microbial Biotechnology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Campus UAM Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Elvira Marín
Rocio Martínez-Arteaga
David Ruano-Gallego
Sofía Fraile
Yago Margolles
Xema Teira
Carlos Gutierrez
Gustavo Bodelón
Luis Ángel Fernández

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening of antibody (Ab) libraries by direct display on the surface of E. coli cells is hampered by the presence of the outer membrane (OM). In this work we demonstrate that the native β-domains of EhaA autotransporter and intimin, two proteins from enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 (EHEC) with opposite topologies in the OM, are effective systems for the display of immune libraries of single domain Abs (sdAbs) from camelids (nanobodies or VHH) on the surface of E. coli K-12 cells and for the selection of high affinity sdAbs using magnetic cell sorting (MACS). We analyzed the capacity of EhaA and intimin β-domains to display individual sdAbs and sdAb libraries obtained after immunization with the extracellular domain of the translocated intimin receptor from EHEC (TirM(EHEC)). We demonstrated that both systems displayed functional sdAbs on the surface of E. coli cells with little proteolysis and cellular toxicity, although E. coli cells displaying sdAbs with the β-domain of intimin showed higher antigen-binding capacity. Both E. coli display libraries were screened for TirM(EHEC) binding clones by MACS. High affinity binders were selected by both display systems, although more efficiently with the intimin β-domain. The specificity of the selected clones against TirM(EHEC) was demonstrated by flow cytometry of E. coli cells, along with ELISA and surface plasmon resonance with purified sdAbs. Finally, we employed the E. coli cell display systems to provide an estimation of the affinity of the selected sdAb by flow cytometry analysis under equilibrium conditions.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryAdhesins, BacterialAdhesins, Escherichia coliAnimalsAntibody SpecificityBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBlotting, WesternCamelusEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEscherichia coli O157Escherichia coli ProteinsFlow CytometryOligonucleotidesPlasmidsSingle-Domain AntibodiesSurface Plasmon ResonanceAdhesins, BacterialAdhesins, Escherichia coliBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinseaeA protein, E coliEhaA, Escherichia coli O157:H7Escherichia coli ProteinsOligonucleotidesPeptide LibrarySingle-Domain Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID24086454
PMCPMC3781032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.