SynthesisPloS one2013
FASL rs763110 polymorphism contributes to cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 43,295 subjects.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- FasL (rs763110) gene polymorphism is not associated with susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in Croatian population.Croatian medical journal · 2020Article
- Genetic polymorphisms predict response to anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment in Crohn's disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Interaction between polyunsaturated fatty acids and genetic variants in relation to breast cancer incidence.Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention (iMedPub) · 2016Article
- Susceptibility to oral cancers with CD95 and CD95L promoter SNPs may vary with the site and gender.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
- Promoter polymorphism of FASL confers protection against female-specific cancers and those of FAS impact the cancers divergently.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublished studies investigating the association between genetic polymorphism -884C/T (rs763110) of the FAS ligand (FASL) promoter and cancer risk reported inconclusive results. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, we performed an updated meta-analysis of all eligible studies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe carried out a meta-analysis, including 47 studies with 19,810 cases and 23,485 controls, to confirm a more conclusive association between the FASL rs763110 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. Overall, significantly reduced cancer risk was associated with the variant -884T when all studies were pooled (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.83, 95%CI = 0.75-0.92; P(heterogeneity)<0.001; TT+TC vs. CC: OR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.77-0.94; P(heterogeneity)<0.001). Stratified analysis revealed that there was a statistically reduced cancer risk in Asians (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.67-0.87; P(heterogeneity)<0.001; TT+TC vs. CC: OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.70-0.90; P(heterogeneity)<0.001) and in patients with cancers of head and neck (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.77-0.99; P(heterogeneity) = 0.118; TT+TC vs. CC: OR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.78-0.99; P(heterogeneity) = 0.168) and ovarian cancer (TC vs. CC: OR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.49-0.90; P(heterogeneity) = 0.187; TT+TC vs. CC: OR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.48-0.86; P(heterogeneity) = 0.199). Meta-regression showed that ethnicity (p = 0.029) and genotyping method (p = 0.043) but not cancer types (p = 0.772), sample size (p = 0.518), or source of controls (p = 0.826) were the source of heterogeneity in heterozygote comparison.
conclusionOur results suggest that the FASL polymorphism rs763110 is associated with a significantly reduced risk of cancer, especially in Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.