Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24086334›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

A single dose of azithromycin does not improve clinical outcomes of children hospitalised with bronchiolitis: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Gabrielle B McCallum, Peter S Morris, Mark D Chatfield, Carolyn Maclennan, Andrew V White, Theo P Sloots, Ian M Mackay, Anne B Chang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Clinical effect of azithromycin adjuvant therapy in children with bronchiolitis: a systematic review and Meta analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Antibiotics for bronchiolitis in children under two years of age.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Azithromycin in viral infections.Reviews in medical virology · 2021
    Review
  12. Macrolides and viral infections: focus on azithromycin in COVID-19 pathology.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Macrolides in critically ill patients with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Viral bronchiolitis.Lancet (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabrielle B McCallumChild Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Peter S Morris
Mark D Chatfield
Carolyn Maclennan
Andrew V White
Theo P Sloots
Ian M Mackay
Anne B Chang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBronchiolitis, one of the most common reasons for hospitalisation in young children, is particularly problematic in Indigenous children. Macrolides may be beneficial in settings where children have high rates of nasopharyngeal bacterial carriage and frequent prolonged illness. The aim of our double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial was to determine if a large single dose of azithromycin (compared to placebo) reduced length of stay (LOS), duration of oxygen (O2) and respiratory readmissions within 6 months of children hospitalised with bronchiolitis. We also determined the effect of azithromycin on nasopharyngeal microbiology.

methodsChildren aged ≤18 months were randomised to receive a single large dose (30 mg/kg) of either azithromycin or placebo within 24 hrs of hospitalisation. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected at baseline and 48 hrs later. Primary endpoints (LOS, O2) were monitored every 12 hrs. Hospitalised respiratory readmissions 6-months post discharge was collected.

results97 children were randomised (n = 50 azithromycin, n = 47 placebo). Median LOS was similar in both groups; azithromycin = 54 hours, placebo = 58 hours (difference between groups of 4 hours 95%CI -8, 13, p = 0.6). O2 requirement was not significantly different between groups; Azithromycin = 35 hrs; placebo = 42 hrs (difference 7 hours, 95%CI -9, 13, p = 0.7). Number of children re-hospitalised was similar 10 per group (OR = 0.9, 95%CI 0.3, 2, p = 0.8). At least one virus was detected in 74% of children. The azithromycin group had reduced nasopharyngeal bacterial carriage (p = 0.01) but no difference in viral detection at 48 hours.

conclusionAlthough a single dose of azithromycin reduces carriage of bacteria, it is unlikely to be beneficial in reducing LOS, duration of O2 requirement or readmissions in children hospitalised with bronchiolitis. It remains uncertain if an earlier and/or longer duration of azithromycin improves clinical and microbiological outcomes for children. The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register. Clinical trials number: ACTRN12608000150347. http://www.anzctr.org.au/TrialSearch.aspx.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinBronchiolitisDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfantLength of StayMalePlacebosAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID24086334
PMCPMC3783434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.