Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24086268›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

The role of flagella in Clostridium difficile pathogenesis: comparison between a non-epidemic and an epidemic strain.

Soza T Baban, Sarah A Kuehne, Amira Barketi-Klai, Stephen T Cartman, Michelle L Kelly, Kim R Hardie, Imad Kansau, Anne Collignon, Nigel P Minton

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A programmed reset mechanism primesScience advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Dissecting the role of flagellar subunits inJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Control ofmBio · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. mSphere · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Clostridioides difficile Sporulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Soza T BabanClostridia Research Group, NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in GI Disease, Centre for Biomolecular Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sarah A Kuehne
Amira Barketi-Klai
Stephen T Cartman
Michelle L Kelly
Kim R Hardie
Imad Kansau
Anne Collignon
Nigel P Minton
University of Nottingham · GBUniversité Paris-Sud · FRInstitut Galien Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G0601176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated infection and inflicts a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Disease symptoms range from self-limiting diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis. Whilst C. difficile has two major virulence factors, toxin A and B, it is generally accepted that other virulence components of the bacterium contribute to disease. C. difficile colonises the gut of humans and animals and hence the processes of adherence and colonisation are essential for disease onset. Previously it has been suggested that flagella might be implicated in colonisation. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing flagellated parental strains to strains in which flagella genes were inactivated using ClosTron technology. Our focus was on a UK-outbreak, PCR-ribotype 027 (B1/NAP1) strain, R20291. We compared the flagellated wild-type to a mutant with a paralyzed flagellum and also to mutants (fliC, fliD and flgE) that no longer produce flagella in vitro and in vivo. Our results with R20291 provide the first strong evidence that by disabling the motor of the flagellum, the structural components of the flagellum rather than active motility, is needed for adherence and colonisation of the intestinal epithelium during infection. Comparison to published data on 630Δerm and our own data on that strain revealed major differences between the strains: the R20291 flagellar mutants adhered less than the parental strain in vitro, whereas we saw the opposite in 630Δerm. We also showed that flagella and motility are not needed for successful colonisation in vivo using strain 630Δerm. Finally we demonstrated that in strain R20291, flagella do play a role in colonisation and adherence and that there are striking differences between C. difficile strains. The latter emphasises the overriding need to characterize more than just one strain before drawing general conclusions concerning specific mechanisms of pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFlagellaHumansIntestinal MucosaSpecies SpecificityBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID24086268
PMCPMC3781105
OpenAlexW2077865765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.