Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24086245›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Prostate cancer stem cell-targeted efficacy of a new-generation taxoid, SBT-1214 and novel polyenolic zinc-binding curcuminoid, CMC2.24.

Galina I Botchkina, Edison S Zuniga, Rebecca H Rowehl, Rosa Park, Rahuldev Bhalla, Agnieszka B Bialkowska, Francis Johnson, Lorne M Golub, Yu Zhang, Iwao Ojima and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Galina I BotchkinaDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America ; Institute of Chemical Biology & Drug Development, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Edison S Zuniga
Rebecca H Rowehl
Rosa Park
Rahuldev Bhalla
Agnieszka B Bialkowska
Francis Johnson
Lorne M Golub
Yu Zhang
Iwao Ojima
Kenneth R Shroyer
Stony Brook University · USStony Brook University Hospital · US

Funding

PROSTATE CANCER STEM CELL-TARGETED ACTIVITY OF A NEW-GENERATION TAXOIDSR21CA150085 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BOTCHKINA, GALINA I · 2010 to 2011
$371k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA150085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death among men. Multiple evidence suggests that a population of tumor-initiating, or cancer stem cells (CSCs) is responsible for cancer development and exceptional drug resistance, representing a highly important therapeutic target. The present study evaluated CSC-specific alterations induced by new-generation taxoid SBT-1214 and a novel polyenolic zinc-binding curcuminoid, CMC2.24, in prostate CSCs. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe CD133(high)/CD44(high) phenotype was isolated from spontaneously immortalized patient-derived PPT2 cells and highly metastatic PC3MM2 cells. Weekly treatment of the NOD/SCID mice bearing PPT2- and PC3MM3-induced tumors with the SBT-1214 led to dramatic suppression of tumor growth. Four of six PPT2 and 3 of 6 PC3MM2 tumors have shown the absence of viable cells in residual tumors. In vitro, SBT-1214 (100 nM-1 µM; for 72 hr) induced about 60% cell death in CD133(high)/CD44(+/high) cells cultured on collagen I in stem cell medium (in contrast, the same doses of paclitaxel increased proliferation of these cells). The cytotoxic effects were increased when SBT-1214 was combined with the CMC2.24. A stem cell-specific PCR array assay revealed that this drug combination mediated massive inhibition of multiple constitutively up-regulated stem cell-related genes, including key pluripotency transcription factors. Importantly, this drug combination induced expression of p21 and p53, which were absent in CD133(high)/CD44(high) cells. Viable cells that survived this treatment regimen were no longer able to induce secondary spheroids, exhibited significant morphological abnormalities and died in 2-5 days.

conclusionsWe report here that the SBT-1214 alone, or in combination with CMC2.24, possesses significant activity against prostate CD133(high)/CD44(+/high) tumor-initiating cells. This drug combination efficiently inhibits expression of the majority of stem cell-related genes and pluripotency transcription factors. In addition, it induces a previously absent expression of p21 and p53 ("gene wake-up"), which can potentially reverse drug resistance by increasing sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCurcuminGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplastic Stem CellsProstatic NeoplasmsTaxoidsXenograft Model Antitumor Assays1,7-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-N-phenylaminocarbonylhepta-1,6-dien-3,5-dioneAntineoplastic AgentsCurcuminSB T-1214Taxoids

Identifiers

PMID24086245
PMCPMC3782470
OpenAlexW1981422886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.