Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24085688›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2014

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus case studies.

Madeleine G Sowash, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial resistance and clonality ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Characteristics ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Genetic Diversity among Methicillin-ResistantTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Relationship between Nasal Carriage ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Properties ofGlobal pediatric health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Detection of diverse genotypes of Methicillin-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madeleine G SowashDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Anne-Catrin Uhlemann

Funding

Mechanisms of S. aureus transmission and persistence.K08AI090013 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI UHLEMANN, ANNE-CATRIN · 2010 to 2014
$655k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI090013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has changed the landscape of S. aureus infections around the globe. Initially recognized for its ability to cause disease in young and healthy individuals without healthcare exposures as well as for its distinct genotype and phenotype, this original description no longer fully encompasses the diversity of CA-MRSA as it continues to expand its niche. Using four case studies, we highlight a wide range of the clinical presentations and challenges of CA-MRSA. Based on these cases we further explore the globally polygenetic background of CA-MRSA with a special emphasis on generally less characterized populations.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedPneumoniaStaphylococcal InfectionsTravel MedicineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24085688
PMCPMC4066969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.