SynthesisDrugs2013
A systematic review of pharmacological pain management in multiple sclerosis.
Synthesis in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Treating Symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis: a Systematic Review of Reviews.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018Pooled it
- Cannabinoids in Pain Management and Palliative Medicine.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Pooled it
- Opioid Signaling in Multiple Sclerosis: Emerging Targets for Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From farm to bedside: Potential of medical cannabis in global health.Complementary therapies in medicine · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Approach for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Cannabinoid-Based Medicines and Multiple Sclerosis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabinoids: an evidence mapping and appraisal of systematic reviews.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Review
- Benefits and harms of medical cannabis: a scoping review of systematic reviews.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- Cannabis for Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis-High Expectations, Poor Data.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Traditional Uses of Cannabinoids and New Perspectives in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Pressure pain assessment may predict the outcome of spinal cord stimulation for refractory epilepsy.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2018Review
- Cannabinoids and Pain: New Insights From Old Molecules.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
- Cannabinoid Signaling and Neuroinflammatory Diseases: A Melting pot for the Regulation of Brain Immune Responses.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2015Review
- Lower corticospinal excitability and greater fatigue among people with multiple sclerosis experiencing pain.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoth chronic and acute pain have been cited as the most common symptoms amongst patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with recent prevalence estimates as high as 83 %. The evidence for spasticity and trigeminal neuralgia pharmacological treatments in MS has been systematically reviewed, but no equivalent reviews have been published concerning MS pain unrelated to these two conditions.
objectiveOur objective was to systematically review pain management strategies for the reduction of non-spastic and non-trigeminal neuralgic pain in MS patients. DATA SOURCES: Experimental studies published after 1965 were chosen for review by searching electronic databases (e.g. PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, and clinicaltrials.gov) and bibliographies/citations of previously published reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if all participants were adults clinically diagnosed with MS, study sample was not restricted to participants with spasticity or trigeminal neuralgia, and participant-reported pain was a primary or secondary outcome measured with a validated tool. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS
methodsRecords were screened and methodological qualities of included studies were assessed independently by two reviewers under the supervision of another reviewer using the principles recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions and the levels of evidence espoused by the American Academy of Neurology.
resultsFifteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for review; interventions included antidepressants, anticonvulsants, dextromethorphan/quinidine, cannabinoids, and opioids/opioid antagonists. The pooled effect size for anticonvulsants (4 studies, 78 participants) was -1.88 (95 % CI: -3.13 to -0.64). The pooled effect size for cannabinoids (3 studies, 565 participants) was 0.08 (95 % CI: -0.74 to 0.89). Overall, only four trials reported Class 1 evidence. For these trials, dizziness was the most commonly reported adverse event, followed by nausea and somnolence. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of trials in MS patients with chronic pain precludes specific recommendations for treatment strategies. The review did not reveal any studies of drug combinations.
conclusionsMore trials with rigorous design and reporting are needed to determine effective treatments for specific pain types presenting in people living with MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.