Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24085590›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2013

Pharmacokinetic characterization of tizanidine nasal spray, a novel intranasal delivery method for the treatment of skeletal muscle spasm.

Daniela Cristina Vitale, Cateno Piazza, Tiziana Sinagra, Vincenzo Urso, Francesco Cardì, Filippo Drago, Salvatore Salomone

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02934061 (A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 0,5 mg Tizaspray® Administered Intranasally Versus Sirdalud® 2 mg Tablets, in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02934061 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 0,5 mg Tizaspray® Administered Intranasally Versus Sirdalud® 2 mg Tablets, in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMDM S.p.A.Ran2016 to 2017Enrolled117ConditionsLow Back PainArmsTizaspray® administered intranasally, Sirdalud® 2 mg tablets administered
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Traumatic Brain Injury and Coenzyme Q10: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela Cristina VitalePharmacokinetic Unit, Unifarm Research Center, Catania, Italy.
Cateno Piazza
Tiziana Sinagra
Vincenzo Urso
Francesco Cardì
Filippo Drago
Salvatore Salomone
University of Catania · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe skeletal muscle relaxant tizanidine is approved by the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency for treating spasticity and is supplied as tablets for oral administration. However, tizanidine has a poor bioavailability, due to extensive first-pass metabolism. Therefore, the nasal route of administration, which bypasses portal circulation, may increase the bioavailability of tizanidine and, possibly, reduce the time to peak plasma concentration, thereby shorting the latency of therapeutic effect. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of tizanidine nasal spray and compare it to the profile of tizanidine oral tablets.

methodsThis open-label, phase I study comprised two protocols: protocol 1, tizanidine HCl solution (32.73 mg/mL) intranasally at single doses of 2 and 4 mg versus 4 mg tizanidine oral tablets (randomized, three periods crossover, 12 healthy subjects); and protocol 2, tizanidine HCl solution (16.36 mg/mL) intranasally at a single dose of 1 mg vs. 4 mg tizanidine oral tablets (randomized, two periods crossover, 12 healthy subjects, one dropout). Tizanidine plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

resultsThere was a linear relationship between different dosages of intranasal formulation and the area under the concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). The relative bioavailability of the different dosages of intranasal formulation were 1.29, 1.93, and 4.23 for 1, 2, and 4 mg intranasal administration, respectively. Comparison of C(max) values gave the following ratios: 0.91, 1.39, and 2.73, for 1, 2, and 4 mg intranasal administration, respectively. The mean time to C(max) (t(max)) was 0.99, 0.43, and 0.63 h for 1, 2, and 4 mg intranasal administration, respectively, whereas it was 1.13 and 1.30 h for the two series of 4 mg tizanidine oral tablets.

conclusionsThe bioavailability of the tizanidine intranasal formulation was higher than that of tizanidine oral tablets. The t(max) was also shorter with the intranasal formulation. No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study, such that the two formulations resulted equally well-tolerated. The intranasal formulation of tizanidine results are therefore worthy of subsequent clinical testing in phase II.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdultAnimalsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityChromatography, High Pressure LiquidClonidineCross-Over StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle Relaxants, CentralMuscle, SkeletalSpasmTandem Mass SpectrometryYoung AdultClonidineMuscle Relaxants, Centraltizanidine

Identifiers

PMID24085590
OpenAlexW2081354416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.