Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24085533›Full record

ArticleBiomedical microdevices2014

Single-cell analysis of embryoid body heterogeneity using microfluidic trapping array.

Jenna L Wilson, Shalu Suri, Ankur Singh, Catherine A Rivet, Hang Lu, Todd C McDevitt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical microdevices, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Organs to Cells and Cells to Organoids: The Evolution ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna L Wilson *The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shalu Suri *School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ankur SinghThe George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Catherine A RivetThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hang LuSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Todd C McDevittThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Profiling and Characterizing Prostate Cancer Tumor Dormancy in the Bone MarrowRC1CA144825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VESSELLA, ROBERT LOUIS · 2009 to 2010
$999k
Microfluidic perfusion control of embryonic stem cell differentiationR01EB010061 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MCDEVITT, TODD C · 2010 to 2012
$966k
HIGH-THROUGHPUT HIGH-CONTENT PLATFORM FOR IMAGE-BASED SCREENSR21EB012803 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG · 2010 to 2011
$399k
NCI NIH HHS RC1 CA144825NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB010061NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB010061NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB012803NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB012803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differentiation of pluripotent stem cells as embryoid bodies (EBs) remains a common method for inducing differentiation toward many lineages. However, differentiation via EBs typically yields a significant amount of heterogeneity in the cell population, as most cells differentiate simultaneously toward different lineages, while others remain undifferentiated. Moreover, physical parameters, such as the size of EBs, can modulate the heterogeneity of differentiated phenotypes due to the establishment of nutrient and oxygen gradients. One of the challenges in examining the cellular composition of EBs is the lack of analytical methods that are capable of determining the phenotype of all of the individual cells that comprise a single EB. Therefore, the objective of this work was to examine the ability of a microfluidic cell trapping array to analyze the heterogeneity of cells comprising EBs during the course of early differentiation. The heterogeneity of single cell phenotype on the basis of protein expression of the pluripotent transcription factor OCT-4 was examined for populations of EBs and single EBs of different sizes at distinct stages of differentiation. Results from the cell trap device were compared with flow cytometry and whole mount immunostaining. Additionally, single cells from dissociated pooled EBs or individual EBs were examined separately to discern potential differences in the value or variance of expression between the different methods of analysis. Overall, the analytical method described represents a novel approach for evaluating how heterogeneity is manifested in EB cultures and may be used in the future to assess the kinetics and patterns of differentiation in addition to the loss of pluripotency.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineEmbryoid BodiesFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMiceMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicrofluidicsPluripotent Stem CellsSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24085533
PMCPMC3945678
OpenAlexW1977512402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.