ArticleProteins2014
Specificity of a protein-protein interface: local dynamics direct substrate recognition of effector caspases.
Article in Proteins, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced sampling without borders: on global biasing functions and how to reweight them.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022Review
- An automated protocol for modelling peptide substrates to proteases.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Enhancing the promiscuity of a member of the Caspase protease family by rational design.Proteins · 2020Article
- Electrostatic recognition in substrate binding to serine proteases.Journal of molecular recognition : JMR · 2018Article
- Determinants of Macromolecular Specificity from Proteomics-Derived Peptide Substrate Data.Current protein & peptide science · 2017Review
- Localization of Millisecond Dynamics: Dihedral Entropy from Accelerated MD.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2016Article
- Quantitative Correlation of Conformational Binding Enthalpy with Substrate Specificity of Serine Proteases.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016Article
- Dynamics of an Active-Site Flap Contributes to Catalysis in a JAMM Family Metallo Deubiquitinase.Biochemistry · 2015Article
- Structural Insights into Separase Architecture and Substrate Recognition through Computational Modelling of Caspase-Like and Death Domains.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Cheminformatics Research at the Unilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics Cambridge.Molecular informatics · 2015Article
- Strong nonadditivity as a key structure-activity relationship feature: distinguishing structural changes from assay artifacts.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2015Article
- Dynamics Govern Specificity of a Protein-Protein Interface: Substrate Recognition by Thrombin.PloS one · 2015Article
- Article
- Promiscuous and specific recognition among ephrins and Eph receptors.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Proteases are prototypes of multispecific protein-protein interfaces. Proteases recognize and cleave protein and peptide substrates at a well-defined position in a substrate binding groove and a plethora of experimental techniques provide insights into their substrate recognition. We investigate the caspase family of cysteine proteases playing a key role in programmed cell death and inflammation, turning caspases into interesting drug targets. Specific ligand binding to one particular caspase is difficult to achieve, as substrate specificities of caspase isoforms are highly similar. In an effort to rationalize substrate specificity of two closely related caspases, we investigate the substrate promiscuity of the effector Caspases 3 and 7 by data mining (cleavage entropy) and by molecular dynamics simulations. We find a strong correlation between binding site rigidity and substrate readout for individual caspase subpockets explaining more stringent substrate readout of Caspase 7 via its narrower conformational space. Caspase 3 subpockets S3 and S4 show elevated local flexibility explaining the more unspecific substrate readout of that isoform in comparison to Caspase 7. We show by in silico exchange mutations in the S3 pocket of the proteases that a proline residue in Caspase 7 contributes to the narrowed conformational space of the binding site. These findings explain the substrate specificities of caspases via a mechanism of conformational selection and highlight the crucial importance of binding site local dynamics in substrate recognition of proteases. Proteins 2014; 82:546-555. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.