ArticleEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2013
Porcine intestinal mast cells. Evaluation of different fixatives for histochemical staining techniques considering tissue shrinkage.
Article in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of histochemical methods for the analysis of eosinophils and mast cells using a porcine model of eosinophilic esophagitis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomechanical assessment of chronic liver injury using quantitative micro-elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Modern Imaging Technologies of Mast Cells for Biology and Medicine (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2021Review
- Comparison of histological and computed tomographic measurements of pig lung bronchi.ERJ open research · 2020Article
- Comparison of 2 fixatives in the porcine colon for in situ microbiota studies.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Mucosubstances in the porcine gastrointestinal tract: Fixation, staining and quantification.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2019Article
- Mycobacterial infection induces eosinophilia and production of α-defensin by eosinophils in mice.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2019Article
- Detection of α-defensin in eosinophils in helminth-infected mouse model.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2018Article
- Surprising absence of heparin in the intestinal mucosa of baby pigs.Glycobiology · 2017Article
- Effect of feline skin specimen preparation on postexcision and postfixation tissue shrinkage.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2016Article
- Histochemistry in biology and medicine: a message from the citing journals.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2015Review
- Immunohistochemical demonstration of specific antigens in the human brain fixed in zinc-ethanol-formaldehyde.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2015Article
- Enhancement of immunohistochemical detection of Salmonella in tissues of experimentally infected pigs.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2015Article
- Impact of Histochemistry on biomedical research: looking through the articles published in a long-established histochemical journal.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2014Article
- The porcine innate immune system: an update.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2014Review
- Histochemistry as an irreplaceable approach for investigating functional cytology and histology.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staining of mast cells (MCs), including porcine ones, is critically dependent upon the fixation and staining technique. In the pig, mucosal and submucosal MCs do not stain or stain only faintly after formalin fixation. Some fixation methods are particularly recommended for MC staining, for example the fixation with Carnoy or lead salts. Zinc salt fixation (ZSF) has been reported to work excellently for the preservation of fixation-sensitive antigens. The aim of this study was to establish a reliable histological method for counting of MCs in the porcine intestinum. For this purpose, different tissue fixation and staining methods that also allow potential subsequent immunohistochemical investigations were evaluated in the porcine mucosa, as well as submucosa of small and large intestine. Tissues were fixed in Carnoy, lead acetate, lead nitrate, Zamboni and ZSF and stained subsequently with either polychromatic methylene blue, alcian blue or toluidine blue. For the first time our study reveals that ZSF, a heavy metal fixative, preserves metachromatic staining of porcine MCs. Zamboni fixation was not suitable for histochemical visualization of MCs in the pig intestine. All other tested fixatives were suitable. Alcian blue and toluidine blue co-stained intestinal goblet cells which made a prima facie identification of MCs difficult. The polychromatic methylene blue proved to be the optimal staining. In order to compare MC counting results of the different fixation methods, tissue shrinkage was taken into account. As even the same fixation caused shrinkage-differences between tissue from small and large intestine, different factors for each single fixation and intestinal localization had to be calculated. Tissue shrinkage varied between 19% and 57%, the highest tissue shrinkage was found after fixation with ZSF in the large intestine, the lowest one in the small intestine after lead acetate fixation. Our study emphasizes that MC counting results from data using different fixation techniques can only be compared if the respective study-immanent shrinkage factor has been determined and quantification results are adjusted accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.